Which node(s) to worry about in CFB amplifiers - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th February 2004, 12:04 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Pjotr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Quote:
Originally posted by pjacobi

Summary:
Your standard CFB layout (as in EL2020 or QRV06) has (approximately) only one voltage gain stage, as the input stage is working into a low Z node.
An archetypical "standard" audio amplifier with LTP inputs (as seen in the Self, Slone and numerous other books) has two voltage gain stages, as in the input stage is working into a high Z node.
But you can also have it the other way around, as shown above.

Regards,
Peter Jacobi
Hi Peter,

Sorry, but I am missing the point what you actually want to tell us.

Regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2004, 12:05 PM   #12
pjacobi is offline pjacobi  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hamburg
Send a message via AIM to pjacobi Send a message via MSN to pjacobi Send a message via Yahoo to pjacobi
Default Folded Cascode

Quote:
Originally posted by Pjotr
[...]
http://www-s.ti.com/sc/psheets/slva051/slva051.pdf
[...]
When seeing the schematic for the THS4001 in this paper, I realized that I've forgotten another important topology: folded cascode.

This is another possibility to let a LTP input work into a low Z node and consequently resulting in a single voltage gain stage.

See these schematics:

Symmetrical version:
PDF: http://www.linearaudio.de/scratch/fo...ascode-sym.pdf
LTSpice: http://www.linearaudio.de/scratch/fo...ascode-sym.asc

Asymmetrical version:
PDF: http://www.linearaudio.de/scratch/fo...scode-asym.pdf
LTSpice: http://www.linearaudio.de/scratch/fo...scode-asym.asc

Some observations:
- It's not straightforward to mix this with a diamond input stage, as you must add 180 somewhere for the right polarity.
- Especially the symmetric version behaves in simulation very similiar to a diamond+current mirror topology. It would be most interesting to compare measured and perceived performance
- Further cascoding with JFETs will give those low THD numbers in simulation, which are often laughed about (but not near -300dB as Bernhard reqularely achieves...)
- Curiously, in the asym version K2 and K3 are of same (low) height wheras in the sym version K3 is 10dB lower. Go figure!

Regards,
Peter Jacobi
__________________
--
YMMV
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DVI switch, worry about frequency? ak_47_boy Everything Else 10 24th November 2007 03:51 AM
Impedance peak (worry or not?) arc2v Multi-Way 1 26th October 2007 11:03 PM
Buying worry Dr_EM Everything Else 2 8th October 2007 02:40 PM
BOZ voltages, worry or not? bays_9a5tt Pass Labs 2 7th September 2005 11:03 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2