|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
Mr. Wurcer,
There has been some interest here in composite op amp-buffer gain blocks. Walt Jung has been a proponent of this approach for audio circuits for several years. My questions are on biasing the op amp output stage with a constant current source, often in conjunction with an in loop buffer. Are improvements in sonics due to conversion of the op amp's complementary follower output to an effectively single ended follower with the CCS (biased greater than the original quiescent current)? What are the advantages and disadvantages of increasing the current source value further above the original complementary follower quiescent current? What would a typical output stage bias be for something like the AD825 or AD8610? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Fred,
This biasing technique can just put the crossover issue out of the picture. There is a measurable reduction in distortion by doing this. Power is a big concern in most commercial applications so the output stage is usually biased at a few hundred micro-Amps to a couple of milli-Amps depending on the intended application. If you bias the output so it is true class-A you are ahead of the game. Most of the modern amplifiers are rated to drive a pretty hefty load, so you can go beyond a little but there will be diminishing gain. Stay well within the rated drive current and you will be OK. The question remains as to N-ness or P-ness in the direction of the CCS, you will have to experiment and determine for yourself. I did this experiment years ago on a classic Bipolar process (bad pnp) and the pnp (pull up) was better, go figure. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
Thanks Scott! You are a gentleman and a scholar.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some Quad els57 questions! - Novice Questions! | Fanuc | Planars & Exotics | 13 | 5th December 2007 10:26 AM |
| Scott Wurcer at 92nd Convention of the AES | aparatusonitus | Solid State | 5 | 6th June 2007 04:21 PM |
| questions about spl ect... | theChris | Multi-Way | 5 | 18th November 2002 04:12 AM |
| Questions, questions, from newb DIYer | Phatman91624 | Multi-Way | 41 | 3rd August 2002 03:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10044 seconds (56.41% PHP - 43.59% MySQL) with 10 queries |