No,scope before the output coil😉No RF filter cap at the input? )
Valery,YOU & Jeff you have done a Very good job, congratulations!
Last edited:
Ah! Of course. OK. I like it!
It is designed to sound delicious - relatively low loop gain, minimum compensation, high open loop linearity. Hope you will like the sound!
How is the heatsink temperature during your tests?
It is designed to sound delicious - relatively low loop gain, minimum compensation, high open loop linearity. Hope you will like the sound!
How is the heatsink temperature during your tests?
The main heatsink tempreture is 48C° (when this main heatsink isn't in the right vertical position,)Ah! Of course. OK. I like it!
It is designed to sound delicious - relatively low loop gain, minimum compensation, high open loop linearity. Hope you will like the sound!
How is the heatsink temperature during your tests?
Tempreture on IPS heatsink(VAS) is 66c°😡 Probably a larger heatsink will do the job
>> on output drivers heatsink is 56c°😡 The same for this
Last edited:
The main heatsink tempreture is 48C° (when this main heatsing isn't in the right vertical position,)
Tempreture on IPS heatsink(VAS) is 66c°😡 Probably a larger heatsink will do the job
>> on output drivers heatshing is 56c°😡 The same for this
OK. Not cool, but acceptable. I will think about certain tuning the IPS up for cooling it down in the future.
No,scope before the output coil😉
Valery,YOU & Jeff you have done a Very good job, congratulations!
Thank you man!

I was planning to use the taller version of the heat sinks for the drivers, but was out of stock when I shipped the parts out. This is likely a good idea. I layed out the VZ-X4 input board with a large custom heat sink in mind, but ended up with the TO126 transistor orientation reversed for this. I might rework this one for the larger heat sink again.
Ok Jeff,the real world test is useful for updated versions🙂I was planning to use the taller version of the heat sinks for the drivers, but was out of stock when I shipped the parts out. This is likely a good idea. I layed out the VZ-X4 input board with a large custom heat sink in mind, but ended up with the TO126 transistor orientation reversed for this. I might rework this one for the larger heat sink again.
Last edited:
Yes real world tests are great. Thanks. I've been putting off real world testing of mine until I get proper transformers, but that's been a four month wait already.
I think this input will be a problem as is when it goes into a chassis with reduced air flow. The electrolytics are going to bake pretty badly as is too. It shouldn't be too hard to shuffle parts around and come up with a good billet heat sink profile to cool it.
I think this input will be a problem as is when it goes into a chassis with reduced air flow. The electrolytics are going to bake pretty badly as is too. It shouldn't be too hard to shuffle parts around and come up with a good billet heat sink profile to cool it.
Yes real world tests are great. Thanks. I've been putting off real world testing of mine until I get proper transformers, but that's been a four month wait already.
I think this input will be a problem as is when it goes into a chassis with reduced air flow. The electrolytics are going to bake pretty badly as is too. It shouldn't be too hard to shuffle parts around and come up with a good billet heat sink profile to cool it.
We will also slightly reduce the currents down to 5mA for those TO-126 ones - they are around 7.5mA now, I believe, which is a little bit excessive. Just a matter of changing some resistor values.
Yes you are right,the enclosure will be a problem with this temperature conditions.😡Yes real world tests are great. Thanks. I've been putting off real world testing of mine until I get proper transformers, but that's been a four month wait already.
I think this input will be a problem as is when it goes into a chassis with reduced air flow. The electrolytics are going to bake pretty badly as is too. It shouldn't be too hard to shuffle parts around and come up with a good billet heat sink profile to cool it.
I will do some measurements soon.We will also slightly reduce the currents down to 5mA for those TO-126 ones - they are around 7.5mA now, I believe, which is a little bit excessive. Just a matter of changing some resistor values.
Yes that would help a lot too. I'm looking forward to giving this one a proper audition. It sounds great on the test bench!
Be carefull,i ended up with a burning woofer😡Yes that would help a lot too. I'm looking forward to giving this one a proper audition. It sounds great on the test bench!
My last test woofer is death.
I can't resist to play loud


Last edited:
Be carefull,i ended up with a burning woofer😡
My last test woofer is death.
I can't resist to play loud![]()
Just too loud or did you get DC on the output?
I hope not😱Just too loud or did you get DC on the output?
This is a job for d.c protection circuit😉
Last edited:
We'll have to get you set up with the proper protection system to go with these amplifiers next.
We will ask Valery,is it possible this amplifier send a large d.c voltage to the load(due to overdriving ) and then play again well?We'll have to get you set up with the proper protection system to go with these amplifiers next.
This occurs when +/-50v power supply used.
The previous test using +/-30v hasn't nothing bad.
Now i'm using a clip indicator for sure😉
Last edited:
I actually cannot imagine this kind of behaviour. Unless there was some short term rail "flickering". Even in this case the offset should not be high...
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Revisiting some "old" ideas from 1970's - IPS, OPS