Damping factor of 100 at 10KHz?
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 30th September 2014, 04:06 PM #1 rhythmsandy diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2012 Damping factor of 100 at 10KHz? Agreed that the DF is immaterial if the cable has enough resistance but i have listened couple of amps having such high figures it even means DF at 100Hz is 10000 hence super grip even with cable resistance this will endup having a DF of in the order of 500 which is more than sufficient. What are the ways to reduce output impedance adding more output pairs? How many required to get the DF at 10K to be 100. Is there any connection between the DF and Freq response of the amplifier? like extended upper freq like more than 100KHz has better grip at lower frequencies?
rayma
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rhythmsandy Agreed that the DF is immaterial if the cable has enough resistance but i have listened couple of amps having such high figures it even means DF at 100Hz is 10000 hence super grip even with cable resistance this will endup having a DF of in the order of 500 which is more than sufficient. What are the ways to reduce output impedance adding more output pairs? How many required to get the DF at 10K to be 100. Is there any connection between the DF and Freq response of the amplifier? like extended upper freq like more than 100KHz has better grip at lower frequencies?
There's no way to do this without placing the amp right at the driver.
With #6 wire, using three feet long conductors, the loop resistance is 0.025 Ohms. (There is also inductance to consider at HF.)
With an 8 Ohm driver, this gives DF = 320. Even using remote sensing is unlikely to improve things much.

Last edited by rayma; 30th September 2014 at 04:17 PM.

rhythmsandy
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2012
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rayma There's no way to do this without placing the amp right at the driver. With #6 wire, using three feet long conductors, the loop resistance is 0.025 Ohms. (There is also inductance to consider at HF.) With an 8 Ohm driver, this gives DF = 320. Even using remote sensing is unlikely to improve things much.
Agreed im talking only on the specification point of view not on resultant DF when wire used..

Just on the amp specwise...

 30th September 2014, 04:55 PM #4 davidsrsb   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Kuala Lumpur But why? This is one of those specs where the engineering rule of ten applies, Once you get lower than 0.5 Ohm, nothing significant can be achieved and you are creating all manner of stability problems trying
 30th September 2014, 04:59 PM #5 Bare   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: vancouver Why? are you finding this a problem?? Speakers not of decent enough quality to manage Non farty bass or decent dynamics. Some ARE better than others :-) Last edited by Bare; 30th September 2014 at 05:01 PM.
rayma
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
 Originally Posted by davidsrsb But why? This is one of those specs where the engineering rule of ten applies, Once you get lower than 0.5 Ohm, nothing significant can be achieved and you are creating all manner of stability problems trying
Some of the improvements heard with a lower source resistance to the speaker are due to the crossover's impedance acting as a voltage divider.
See one of the Stereophile amplifier reviews for how this can add significant frequency response aberrations.

 30th September 2014, 05:09 PM #7 jcx   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: .. not a problem for a high feedback amp at its output terminals Kelvin sensing to high audio frequency at home audio speaker cable lengths is also not really hard, cable construction isn't trivial though, "quadaxial" 4 signal conductor layer coax cables? feedback may need some modification for the cable Z (Cload) a 3rd way is synthesizing negative audio frequency impedance amplifier output with mixed feedback - such that it cancels most of the audio frequency cable R again fun feedback problem - minor issue of amp output sticking to tails when not loaded... but as others mention it seems a unlikely "solution" with real Loudspeaker loads, their XO components R Last edited by jcx; 30th September 2014 at 05:12 PM.
 30th September 2014, 07:33 PM #8 rhythmsandy diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2012 Yes lpf inductor at woofer generally swomps out the DF so definitely need an amp with very high df.
 30th September 2014, 07:48 PM #9 DouglasSelf   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: London A couple of things: Firstly, there is no difficulty in getting the output impedance down to something like 0.02 Ohm without any special measures or any problems with stability. Secondly, the biggest resistance in the circuit is not the cabling but the resistance of the voice-coil. That will be around 7 Ohm for a unit with a nominal 8 Ohm impedance. This swamps all other resistances. __________________ Douglas Self Last edited by DouglasSelf; 30th September 2014 at 07:50 PM.
DouglasSelf
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
Quote:
 Originally Posted by jcx a 3rd way is synthesizing negative audio frequency impedance amplifier output with mixed feedback - such that it cancels most of the audio frequency cable R again fun feedback problem - minor issue of amp output sticking to tails when not loaded...
Do you know of a solid-state example of this? I'd be interested to see it.
__________________
Douglas Self

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Cro maniac Chip Amps 43 4th August 2015 03:09 PM hartze11 Tubelab 12 3rd October 2011 03:13 PM alanyeoh Pass Labs 1 17th August 2004 10:11 PM thylantyr Solid State 9 14th March 2003 07:37 AM emarald Solid State 15 30th January 2003 03:41 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 AM.