|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This is the Pure Class_A Bridge Amp Driver Using Mosfet
Frequency Response 5Hz To 150KHz Supply Voltage=+40V Current Consumption=20mA Max Input VACrms=4.8V Totally Symmetric PUSH-PULL outputs High Input Impedance~50Kohm Low Output Impedance~1Kohm THD<0.01%
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: US
|
we have had extensive discussion about the phase splitter in the JLH amp thread. Yeah, on paper, mosfet sounds like the best phase splitter you can find. in the real world, however, BJTs seem to do a much better job, especially when you factor in the low gain and worsened linearity from a mosfet phase splitter.
We simulated quite a few mosfet phase splitters (quite incidentally used irf510 as well) and they don't perform as well as the BJTs (in terms of thd figures). However they have a huge advantage over bjt phase splitters in one department: output impedence. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the phase splitter is NOT symmetric: its Zou is considerably higher on the collector side vs. the emitter side. This creates a problem when the phase splitter runs at low current so the mismatch is more apparent. one cure for this is to run the phase splitter at high current, thus lowering the Zout on both collector and emitter. However, that creates a problem of its own for the BJTs: loading of the prior stage. Higher collector current means higher base current thus lower input impedance for the phase splitter. in the JLh1969 design, he runs the collector current at about 0.3ma. Mosfet, being voltage driven (for the most part), doesn't suffer from that problem. i have found that 30-40ma is a good number to run those devices at. and that's not too far from your 20ma figure. In real worlding listening tests, i couldn't tell mosfet phase splitters from bjt phase splitters with high levels of confidence. MOSFET seems to give more clear presentation on the high and low tho. Another thing about those beasts: if you utilize a mosfet phase splitter in a circuitry with global feedback, make sure that it doesn't oscillate: mosfets are more prone to that than BJTs. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I used this cct for a while untill a friend gave me a tip for a better implementation. this difference looks small but the effect on the sound is clear the resitor going into the i/p is not necessary if you use a VN66AFD which I think sounds good. also if you turn the mosfet 'on' more so that the voltage accross the o/p is only about double what you think the signal will be the measured distortion decreases significantly hope this helps mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
Much more better ( in all parametres ) phase inverter you get if you use only one cheap dual opams such as NE 5532 - your circuit is " prehistory "
.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: US
|
Quote:
while some calls this a phase inverter, it actually does a little bit more: it generates two output signals, 180 degrees apart. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: US
|
has anyone thought about using either a differential pair or a current mirror to generate opposite signals?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
did you try both ? which did you prefer ? are you really sure that prehistory does not sound better ? powered with a battery with a good cap across it I thought this cct sounded rather good but not as good as the even more 'prehistoric' transformer volume control. which in my universe is about as good as it gets cheers mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Quote:
I got the same idea But I didn't launch my simulator now. I'm not sure how to implement this design. One possibility would be to build a 2 stage amp, with a diff pair and a PP output stage. Like an aleph (that could be used as a starting point) but with a PP output stage, driven from each leg from the diff pair |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how ir2110 drives the high side mosfet in h bridge | gowri | Class D | 2 | 10th April 2008 06:30 AM |
| IR21864 600V 4A Half-Bridge Driver | Workhorse | Class D | 10 | 24th March 2008 08:39 PM |
| a study of bridge driver | digi01 | Chip Amps | 3 | 26th July 2007 06:50 AM |
| Bridge driver | digi01 | Chip Amps | 5 | 24th March 2007 01:40 AM |
| strange effect in mosfet (h-bridge) | alfsch | Class D | 5 | 3rd October 2006 07:35 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11113 seconds (78.36% PHP - 21.64% MySQL) with 11 queries |