Change/Bypass High Pass Filter? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th February 2014, 02:27 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Default Change/Bypass High Pass Filter?

Hello, forum noob here. I'm a physicist but do mechanics, not electronics, so go easy on me.

My son and I are putting together a relatively affordable stereo system for his wakeboat, an older Ski Nautique. The system will consist of the following:

200W x 4 ch. @ ? ohms amp driving four speakers in the boat
125W x 2 ch. @ 4 ohms amp driving two tower speakers
self-amplified subwoofer

My question is about the first item. The amp is an XTP Trifecta 4200. It is being "re-purposed". XTP was designing a system with this amp and tower speakers which had midwoofers and HLCD horn tweeters driven by separate channels of the amp. So channels 1 and 2 were to drive the midwoofers, and 3 and 4 the tweeters. The speakers were never mass produced, and the amps sold off. I actually got 2 new amps for 27 bucks each at an auction.

The manual is awful. I don't know if the 200W is peak or RMS (don't really care), and if the amp is rated for 4 ohms or 2 ohms minimum (do care).

Channels 1 and 2 have a high pass filter (HPF) that is adjustable between 70Hz and 300Hz, which works great for our use. Channels 3 and 4, meant to drive the tweeters, have a HPF adjustable between 2300Hz and 3000Hz, which is of course terrible for our use, where we are trying to drive combination speakers, each with a midwoofer and dome tweeter (and I assume their own crossover inside).

What I have done on the test bench:

1. Tried bridging. Bridged 3 and 4 still go through 2300Hz HPF.

2. So now running two 4 ohm speakers in parallel on each of channels 1 and 2. Not sure if the 2 ohm impedance will burn out the amp long term. Oh well, I have a spare amp.


I want to change the channel 3 and 4 HPF to be just like the channel 1 and 2 HPF. Move it down to 70Hz to 300Hz.

OR, move it to a fixed 100Hz HPF.

OR, just bypass it completely.


a) I cannot locate a circuit diagram.

b) I know what HPF circuit diagrams look like on paper... beyond that, I have no idea what I'm doing.

Do I have a prayer? If not, I'll leave the speakers in parallel and cross my fingers. It's a shame to ride two channels hard while two are loafing, though, just because of that doggone HPF.

Thanks in advance.

  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2014, 11:40 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Hi folks,

Lots of views but no replies yet. Do you think I'm posting this in the wrong place? I guess I'm looking for some thoughts from an EE type person.


  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2014, 06:37 PM   #3
rsavas is offline rsavas  Canada
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Ontario
XTP Trifecta 4200.
need a service manual or schematics in order to make it easy to figure out.
I take it that you want to disable the HPF for the tweeters. I guess the HPF can be by-paased somehow. Changing the comps you will need a schematic or reverse engineer the design (draw schematic form the layout) which is a PITA.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2014, 08:17 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Thanks for the reply.

I got a few replies on another forum (not sure if this forum allows posting to other forums, so for now I won't link to it). The folks there suggested that I use the amp as it was designed--as a true bi-amp. So I'm going to open up the speakers and see if it's easy to access the mid and tweeter wires, to bypass the speaker internal crossover circuit. If so, then I would parallel the front & rear left mids from amp ch 1, front & rear right mids from amp ch 2, front & rear left tweeters from amp ch 3, and front & rear right tweeters from amp ch 4.

It actually seems like a lot of messing around to end up with a bi-amp setup, but it would allow ch 3&4 to handle the high frequencies and so drive ch 1&2 less for a given volume. I have since come across a very interesting bi-amping article, which is a little bit self-contradictory: it touts the benefits of active bi-amping, but states that the lower frequencies contain most of the power. So I'm wondering how much of the power goes to the mids, and how much to the tweeters... i.e. is it worth re-wiring the speakers and running double cables if only 1/8 or 1/4 of the wattage is offloaded from ch 1&2 to ch 3&4 for the tweeters. I'll take a look at one of the speaker's internals and see what's involved.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2014, 02:58 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
After a lot of discussion on the other forum, and a good bit of testing of the amp, we've decided not to go the bi-amp route. Too complicated for probably no perceivable gain. So I'm back to wondering if I can modify the Ch 3&4 HPF to match the Ch 1&2 HPF. Or I will just run a pair of speakers in parallel on each of Ch 1 and 2. That only presents 2 ohms per channel, though, so we'll see if we burn up the amp.

Would it be typical that an "amp guy" could look at a photo of an amp circuit board (if I could even get to it) and say, "yup, change out that resistor and that capacitor and you're golden"?


  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2014, 01:11 PM   #6
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
Originally Posted by boaterdad
Would it be typical that an "amp guy" could look at a photo of an amp circuit board (if I could even get to it) and say, "yup, change out that resistor and that capacitor and you're golden"?
Only an 'amp guy' who was very familiar with the particular item. The rest of us would need a circuit diagram, because photos don't tell us much.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2014, 02:21 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Follow-up: I ended up just running a pair of speakers in parallel on Ch 1, and a pair in parallel on Ch 2, and it's been working fine in the boat.

Of course, I forgot to replace the alternator with a high-output model and ended up doing so while on vacation, but that's another story..............

Thanks for your input.
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The ultimate rumble filter - far more effective than just a high pass filter! monty78pig Analogue Source 29 26th July 2013 10:15 AM
High Pass Filter soundwavesteve Full Range 6 11th November 2012 11:54 PM
DIY One fader mixer with Filter Low Pass, Hi Pass, Notch Pass Filter PGM stevep314 Analog Line Level 0 10th August 2010 09:15 PM
high pass filter prabanjas Chip Amps 1 9th October 2009 01:37 PM
high gain 2nd order high pass active filter topology sreten Solid State 21 23rd March 2006 01:26 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2