many smaller caps Vs big ones - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th February 2002, 06:03 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Send a message via ICQ to Christian
Default many smaller caps Vs big ones

I'm in the process of building an amp, and wen it comes to the filter-capacitors I've heard that it can be better to use many small caps instead of a few big.

Is there any truth to this?

Best Regards,
Christian V
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2002, 06:12 PM   #2
Freddie is offline Freddie  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sweden
Check this thread.
Power supply and capacitance....

/Freddie
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2002, 08:03 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
wuffwaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
Hello Christian,

another advantage of using a lot of small caps is that you can "shape" them to fit your amps package. I used 100 x 1000microF per channel and they fit nicely below the amplifier pcbs on a sheat of plexiglas placed on the heatsink. (about 400mm x 100mm and only 40mm high)
This way Ive got a very short path from cap to amp pcb.

william
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2002, 11:37 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Default Parralleling caps

It is usually a good idea to parallel caps but the some knowledge of the behavior of the capacitors being used is required. The goal is usually to spread the self-resonant frequencies of the capacitors in such a manor that the impedance presented by the capacitors remains fairly constant over a range of 10 to 50 Mhz or more.

This will require capacitors of many different values and types. Using parallel caps without knowledge of the capacitors behavior does not guaranty good results. Using audiophile specialty caps also does not guaranty good results.

There have been some very good articles posted on the Internet that address is issue. Capacitor selection has always presented a special problem to me so a number of years back I added a top of the line HP LCR analyzer to my work bench to help me resolve some of these problems. I have found this to be a good investment.


John Fassotte
Alaskan Audio
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2002, 02:21 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
ME SOUND (peter stein, nsw, australia) in ME850 class a amp, uses 50 * 3300 uF caps connected in "power matrix" per rail (amplifier total 330,000 uF). Gives extremely low impedence/frequency power supply section - requires soft start - one of these amps driving Duntech Sovereigns lifts the roof big time - Works for peter! Well worth it, If you are prepaired to spend the money on this technique.
Maybe this helps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2002, 02:35 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Malaysia
Smaller Caps

I for one do believe in a larger numer of smaller caps. I do not use so-called audiophile caps but good quality low inpedance units(Philips, Seimens, RIFA would be fine!). I have built a number of amps of 100W output with 2/3 pairs of power devices and I designed the layout myself. What I do is to use a piece of low impedance cap of between 4700 - 10000uF per device and the pcb is designed in such a manner that the legs of the power transistor solders directly onto the leg of the cap(sorry, impossible for TO3's!!) which is further paralleled with a piece of ultra low impedance 100uF electrolytic cap and a 2.2uF film cap(available from Farnell & RS). For wiring, each cap/output device is fed by a SEPARATE wire from the rectifier and also a SEPARATE earth return to the main chassis earth (kind of messy and reminds you of hard wiring in early tube hifi sets). This way, you avoid the eddy currents that bounce around when many devices share a common power and earth track. (BTW, if you try this, use equal wiring lengths for each device- I'm paranoid about connection symmetry!!)You'll be pleasantly surprised with the difference in sound when you listen to quiet passages. Details are more and the sound is lively and bouncy while big tin can size caps tend to give a heavier and more sluggish sound but killer heavy weight bass! You will also find that you can "tune" the sound by changing the small paralleled E cap and film cap!
If you're happy with the sound, you may want to try running separate grounds with a "star chassis ground" arrangement for ALL other parts of your power amp or at least run a separate ground for the input section. Mixing your signal grounds with the power supply decoupling caps ground is a strict no! no!
Happy experimenting!

ckt
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2002, 10:47 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
Default Capacitor size

If you have a choice between 2 capacitors, same manufacturer, same series, same voltage, same value........except one is tall and skinny, and the other is short and fat:

Choose the short and fat one. It will handle more ripple current, and last longer. Might even sound better.

Jcko.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2002, 11:25 PM   #8
JoeBob is offline JoeBob  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
JoeBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
Jocko Homo, why is it that the fat ones handle more ripple current and last longer, just curious.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2002, 05:10 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
Default Form factor

It is such that the short, fat ones are better able to dissipate the heat generated internally by the ripple currents. Mepco used to put out some good technical advice on this stuff. Now that Philips owns them........well, who knows.

Built an amp once with an array of tall, skinny caps with good specs. Sounded awful. There was no short, fat counterpart in that series. Rebuilt the amp with one big one, much better. Doesn't mean it will always be that way. Just worked out that way on that project. I have some other thoughts on filter caps you might want to hear, but they are subjective.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2002, 05:30 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas,Texas
Talking Fat and skinny of it

Hmmmmm...... I always liked tall and skinny ones for Panasonic HFQs under 1000uF. I am well familiar to your preference for fat ones when it comes to the response to the bottom end. Am dying to hear your subjective observations...... I have a feeling that there are some mechanical resonance considerations in the form factor. I have heard differences in caps from the same manufacter,
the same series, the same voltage, the same value, but different
height and diameter.

H.H.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just one big filter cap or more smaller filter caps ... beppe61 Power Supplies 2 18th July 2006 05:46 PM
Can I replace Samhwa caps in PS with smaller value ones of better quality ? Elberoth Solid State 1 9th January 2005 07:16 AM
Are Parallel smaller caps better/worse than big? Arx Parts 4 9th November 2003 10:54 PM
smaller caps punchpeanut Chip Amps 0 27th August 2003 01:59 PM
Getting Smaller pinkmouse Chip Amps 6 21st July 2003 02:11 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2