Slewmaster - CFA vs. VFA "Rumble"

Spooky measurments.

Power supply
+/-50V /2x22.000uf
Out tran. MJW21195,96 one pair.
Idle current 60mA.
Bandwidth (tested at 10v RMS OUT) 3,2Hz-160KHz (-3db)
Vout just before clipping=24V RMS/8R/10KHz 850mV inp.
Visible(scope)clipping at 1v rms inp.
Vout hard clipping=34V RMS/8R
Scopes.UP out signal,down inp signal
1)10KHz
2)20KHz
3)50KHz
Square wave scopes.
4)50KHz
5)100KHz
6)200KHz
7)clip 1KHz
8)clip 20KHz
 

Attachments

  • DSC07597.JPG
    DSC07597.JPG
    573.5 KB · Views: 966
  • DSC07604.JPG
    DSC07604.JPG
    578.4 KB · Views: 295
  • DSC07603.JPG
    DSC07603.JPG
    559.9 KB · Views: 296
  • DSC07602.JPG
    DSC07602.JPG
    557 KB · Views: 297
  • DSC07601.JPG
    DSC07601.JPG
    540.5 KB · Views: 809
  • DSC07600.JPG
    DSC07600.JPG
    594.7 KB · Views: 827
  • DSC07599.JPG
    DSC07599.JPG
    563.2 KB · Views: 863
  • DSC07598.JPG
    DSC07598.JPG
    586.4 KB · Views: 903
Last edited:
Thimios, can you turn down the square wave as much as you can, so we can see small-signal behavior? The asymmetric square wave is a result of overloading the frontend - this doesn't happen with normal listening. Small-signal square wave shape however shows how the amp behaves at listening levels.

Don't use a volume pot, connect the generator directly to the amp input and lower the square voltage. If there is a resistor between the input and the LTP input base, then short the resistor for this test.
 
Thimios, can you turn down the square wave as much as you can, so we can see small-signal behavior? The asymmetric square wave is a result of overloading the frontend - this doesn't happen with normal listening. Small-signal square wave shape however shows how the amp behaves at listening levels.

Don't use a volume pot, connect the generator directly to the amp input and lower the square voltage. If there is a resistor between the input and the LTP input base, then short the resistor for this test.
Ok i will try this soon.
I never use volume pot.for these tests.
Regards.
Thimios.
 
Last edited:
Well I more or less thought from the start of this thread (actually I think it was the 'other' thread - you know the one) that we'd not find a real world difference between CFA and VFA and based on this thread it doesn't seem that I'll need to eat my hat anytime soon ... but I'm still watching 😀

The "side benefit" of all this CFA/VFA banter is better amps on both sides
of the fence. Also , the EF3 bridge has been crossed , no turning back.

CF is a elegant technique , no V/I conversion needed for NFB. but it
has both strengths and weaknesses.
The spooky and the NAD both do the same thing , just the nad omits
the NFB V/I devices.

OS
 
Nad uses 1x33pF
Spooky 1x150pF,2X22pF
looks generous if someone can send these .🙂
Best Regards.
Thimios.

Nad= 1 X150pf multi-ceramic/poly 50v for input filter.
1 X 33-39pf silver mica for comp.

Spooky = 1 X 150pF multi-ceramic/poly 50v for input filter ...
2 X 22pf silver-mica (cdom1/2), Also 2.2-2.7pf silver for "LC" (try this - it
will kill any "overshoot" - increase slew).

OS
 
Nad= 1 X150pf multi-ceramic/poly 50v for input filter.
1 X 33-39pf silver mica for comp.

Spooky = 1 X 150pF multi-ceramic/poly 50v for input filter ...
2 X 22pf silver-mica (cdom1/2), Also 2.2-2.7pf silver for "LC" (try this - it
will kill any "overshoot" - increase slew).

OS
OS ,is this type of capacitor (styroflex) recommended for inp.filter?
 

Attachments

  • inp filter.JPG
    inp filter.JPG
    155.3 KB · Views: 667