Slewmaster - CFA vs. VFA "Rumble"

Richard,
Not sure about the BOM but the NAD V1.2 design back a couple of pages is his best CFA design. All of the different input section work with the same output section. I'll let OS give you the recommended parts list but I think he is leaning to some of the Sanken output transistors. I think with the 5 pairs and 70V rails you are up in the 300 to 400 watt range.
 
OS -- you are confusing my poor little brain. What do you have now that is your best CFA and best OPS with best transistors known to mankind. 200W min. ???

Please?

THx-RNMarsh

Member meanman64 is getting the group-buy together.

Below is the closest I can render to the real output.

The 3-pair OPS can be used with ....

1.OP's ...the MG6330r/9410r - 10A-80V 100ms SOA
http://products.semelab-tt.com/pdf/bipolar/MG6330%20MG6330-R.pdf

2. TO-3p drivers .... Sanken 2SA1294/2SC3263
http://www.sanken-ele.co.jp/en/prod/semicon/pdf/2sc3263e.pdf
They are outputs that think they are drivers - 1.25A 80V 100ms SOA
More than enough for the rather low Cob of 3 pair MGxxxx (250p each) ,
and expected base currents (.6A Ie at 2R full power).

Hell , use another pair of MGxxxx's as drivers .... lowish Cob (250p) higher
gain . We are using TO-126 predrivers , BTW ... why not.

200W ??? ha ha... , try like 400+ with a setup like this. Elector's single
pair MGxxxx amp kit is rated at 125/200W 8/4R !!


We chose the Hawksford +CCS NX (bonsai) for IPS.

His is a good amp , smallish with a little offset.
NOT MINE ! 82+V rails - 145V p-p with <1mv offset (below 2)
Servo works good. Clips nice too.

Member NAF's 3-pair OPS/NAD CFA worked first time as predicted
- no issues.
Coming soon...
PS - If 40-80ppm right up to that huge clipped wave is not enough..
I don't know ?? (typical 20-30ppm any model/any freq.)
OS
 

Attachments

  • 145V clip.jpg
    145V clip.jpg
    49 KB · Views: 771
  • slewmaster3-pair.JPG
    slewmaster3-pair.JPG
    204.9 KB · Views: 751
  • NAD-Spcb.JPG
    NAD-Spcb.JPG
    101.4 KB · Views: 720
Richard,
Not sure about the BOM but the NAD V1.2 design back a couple of pages is his best CFA design. All of the different input section work with the same output section. I'll let OS give you the recommended parts list but I think he is leaning to some of the Sanken output transistors. I think with the 5 pairs and 70V rails you are up in the 300 to 400 watt range.


With the MGxxxx's the 5-pair is a 600W amp and the 3-pair a
350-400 watter.

OMG ! the SOA on them MG's is 2+ times a MJL21193/4 !!

OS
 
OS,
Along with the boms for each different implementation of the ips and the ops will you also give a feedback design for the different combinations? I know they can be done in different types but will you give a couple of or one best feedback circuit for each combo?

I guess I was thinking of the three pairs output power when I tried to answer Richard. So you are saying an average of 150 watts per output pair as a SOA at 70V. That is at 8ohms I imagine.
 
Last edited:
OS,
Along with the boms for each different implementation of the ips and the ops will you also give a feedback design for the different combinations? I know they can be done in different types but will you give a couple of or one best feedback circuit for each combo?

Feedback design ?

Feedback is a full level output signal going right to the IPS.

From there , either the CFB low Z divider or the Higher Z VFA divider ... plus
the servo tap is derived.
The one drawback to this is that the layout has to leave "space"
around the "NFB" pad. Such a huge signal might not go well
with any hi-Z circuitry.

OS
 
Thimios ...
Don't want a needed builder to be left wanting for parts.

To show the flexibility of the NAD-S IPS ,I simulated it with mje 340/350
for Q5/ Q6 (they will fit) , a better pair would just be another
1381/3503 pair , as they have low Cob /higher Ft-Hfe.
You would have a real heavy duty current feedback stage , as well. 🙂

Both swaps worked very well , THD was the worst with the MJE340/350,
1381/3503 were dead even with the KSA/C 992/1845.
Anything at the input can be (anything) as long as it fits. At 12V ,
use the 1015/1815 pair for both the IP pair and the CCS's (Q1-4).

Making these changes in some amps would be harder ... not here - the
servo cleans things up nicely.

You might change the standing current of the VAS with these device
"swaps" ... No problem , as I told NAF .... use either 820R or 1K for R13/16
to bias the VAS for 7-8ma total.
Subtract the VAS LED current , and you should get 4-5ma at the
collectors of Q9/10.
R17/21 (150R) should read about 1.2V at the correct current.

PS - you don't need any 992/1845's to get a working amp , I highly
doubt the larger device's will degrade sound Q.
Below is the schema with changes.
Also , green leds (different If) might also need VAS I adjustment.
You will know when you get it running (NAF ran his VAS "hot" at first - no smoke). 😀

Edit- if you anything other than all plastic devices for Q5/6 , make sure they don't
touch (metal to metal -to-126) ... insulator in between ... then the shrink tubing...
OS
So can i put Q5,6,7,8,9,10 ALL 3503-1381?
 
OS,
Perhaps I am getting this totally out of context but I thought that with a VFA you used a capacitor in the feedback loop and a CFA used a resistor and any shunt component that may be used with different types of feedback topology? Am I way off on that?
 
OS,
Along with the boms for each different implementation of the ips and the ops will you also give a feedback design for the different combinations? I know they can be done in different types but will you give a couple of or one best feedback circuit for each combo?

I guess I was thinking of the three pairs output power when I tried to answer Richard. So you are saying an average of 150 watts per output pair as a SOA at 70V. That is at 8ohms I imagine.

To hit the SOA of 10A like on semelab datasheet ... I had to run 4R .

At 30A (all 3) , those trannies might melt the rail trace (4mm 2 oz.) you might
have to drill a couple holes in that trace to add a rail buss !!

A single pair of Semelab Op's have like 14A 60V SOA ... might make
a good 200W+ /4R sub amp with only 1 pair.
VERY impressive devices at 6$ apiece.
OS
 
OS,
Perhaps I am getting this totally out of context but I thought that with a VFA you used a capacitor in the feedback loop and a CFA used a resistor and any shunt component that may be used with different types of feedback topology? Am I way off on that?

wolverine/ badger uses a DC blocking cap (220u) and TMC (400/82pF) with
that pair "pole split" by a secondary 1.5k Op feedback path.
This is in addition to the standard 22K/820R feedback network (27X gain).

The NX just gets its HF compensation from the VAS. The global
NFB from OP is in the form of a 1k/39R low-Z network.

Different amps / different feedback.

ps - THE "LEACH" has dual HF compensation caps on the VAS and
a standard resistor feedback network. Also , there is a "lead comp"
of 3-5pF in parallel with those resistors .... also different.

OS
 
Thanks OS,
I don't think you address the NAD, that wasn't the leach, which was one of the VFA's I think. I can wait for those details, I just wanted to ask to see if we would have had to figure out the global feedback ourselves. You'll have to later explain the rail buss addition. I think I know what you mean but how you implement that and attach the output devices to it I am not sure? Keep the details for later, thanks for all of this.
 
Thanks OS,
I don't think you address the NAD, that wasn't the leach, which was one of the VFA's I think. I can wait for those details, I just wanted to ask to see if we would have had to figure out the global feedback ourselves. You'll have to later explain the rail buss addition. I think I know what you mean but how you implement that and attach the output devices to it I am not sure? Keep the details for later, thanks for all of this.

Sorry , I called it the NX .. NX = NAD same topology. 😱

OS
 
Skewbaby

Hello OS,

I would like to get verification for the components I intended to use.

For the big stones I have Toshiba O grade 2sa1943/2sc5200 or onsemi mjl0302/mjl0281.

For drivers I have 2sa1837/2SC4793 or mje15034/35.

For T=-126 devices I have a lot of different options.

I guess toshiba all the way would be perfect?

J
 
Hello OS,

I would like to get verification for the components I intended to use.

For the big stones I have Toshiba O grade 2sa1943/2sc5200 or onsemi mjl0302/mjl0281.

For drivers I have 2sa1837/2SC4793 or mje15034/35.

For T=-126 devices I have a lot of different options.

I guess toshiba all the way would be perfect?

J

"For drivers I have 2sa1837/2SC4793" - you will have the exact
HK680R , go for the MJL's ..

OS