|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: away
|
Quote:
For some diode lines, the trr is designed as part of carrier recombination. For some, it is by using an epitaxial process. Some diodes are sandblasted out of a wafer, some are photolithographically designed... They may have changed the trr to drop the VF at the rated current.. In other words, there is a huge amount of things that were done to achieve the higher current rating.. But, none of that means that higher current ratings are inverse to trr.. unless you are intimately involved with the product line, (or me, for that matter), claiming the relation of current vs trr is unsupported.. I've dealt with bigger diodes that were quite fast..you should see some of the 100 mm product out of brown boveri or powerex.. Cheers, John |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
|
Part of the Pass Labs upgrade of the X150 and X250 to the X150.5 and X250.5 is the fast recovery rectifiers.
__________________
----------------------------------------------- Kilowattski |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
But you can't just blindly use fast-recovery diodes. Many of the have horrible artifacts when they turn off (dumping sometimes giant stored charges onto the line). What you want is a controlled recovery, where the turn off condition is fully characterized.
I had some MUR series diodes once they caused the most heinous problems with power line oscillations. In that application I switched to controlled (ultra-fast/ultra-soft) recovery diodes from IRF. Which model I cannot presently remember. Since then I've used Schottky and been pretty happy. I'm even using Schottky rectifiers in the low-current supply of my Krell clone. They make quite high votage and high current rated Schottky rectifiers these days. Just be careful about the thermals. |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
__________________
"Knowing what to do but not why is no use in a changing world" - The Art of Sound Reproduction |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
Good designed amp, which have good PSR, have typical SNR over than 120 dB with standard " slow " rectifier. Don't talk about recovery times ( by normal line frequency 50-60 Hz ), talk about which paramerer of amp will be better in case, when will be used fast diodes. I take only logical arguments, not something like " It use XY too ". Personaly I mean, that all is only humbuk for " milking " of customers
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| byw 100-200 in fast bridge rectifiers | janusz | Solid State | 2 | 8th August 2006 01:08 AM |
| fast vs. slow rectifiers | Franz | Pass Labs | 31 | 17th October 2005 11:55 AM |
| FS: IXYS Ultra fast bridge rectifiers | dqswim | Swap Meet | 19 | 7th July 2004 05:43 AM |
| 200V 50A Fast Recovery POWER Rectifiers | kilowattski | Pass Labs | 7 | 17th February 2004 04:15 PM |
| fast vs. slow rectifiers for leach amp | janey | Solid State | 5 | 2nd January 2003 08:25 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08360 seconds (76.69% PHP - 23.31% MySQL) with 10 queries |