Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st January 2006, 05:33 PM   #71
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southwest
I'll take it if the freight is not too much.
Check freight to 71854.

thanks, sdman

sdman@cableone.net
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2006, 09:50 PM   #72
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
The US Post Office has a flate-rate Priority Mail box for $7 or so that will hold a much bigger transformer, just pack it in crumpled newspaper.

The Sumo transformer is also used in the Andromeda. It is 1.4KVA at 50% duty cycle with 30-30-30-30 and 20-0-20(at low VA).

Bongiorno used the same transformer, heatsink, and chassis for the Andromeda as well. The Andromeda was a 250W class AB amplifier vs the 9 being class A at 60W~70W(9 or 9+).

The 9 is a sliding bias push-pull class A and so is quite efficient as far as class A amplifiers go.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2006, 09:56 PM   #73
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
I should point out that the patent on the 9 is for the bias circuit.

Using IRF type FETs will not work in this circuit without a bias servo. Lateral types will.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2006, 10:20 PM   #74
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southwest
djk, Any idea what the xfm weighs?

sdman
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2006, 11:02 PM   #75
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
It doesn't weigh that much, 12~15 lbs or so. The USPO will sent any weight you can fit in that box for the flat rate.

If trying to build one with an opamp, remember the LF353 was selected to work on ±20V. Use a ±24V rated OPA2604 or select an AD823 for ±20V operation. Either will sound vastly better than an LF353.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2006, 10:06 PM   #76
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Germany
Default new amp is a circlotron but different to Sumo

Hallo Joe,

regarding post no. 61: the picture is coming from a test article in german hi-fi magazin "stereoplay". At the moment (and I guess for a limited time only) you can download the test for free here:

http://www.stereoplay.de/sixcms/medi...106Thorens.pdf

If this link does not work go to www.stereoplay.de , click onto the eye catching picture of the new Thorens TEM 3200 amp and then go to the end of the preview text to the download button. The test is in german, of course, but it has some nice pictures and maybe google translator could help a little.

From my point of view this new amp is different to the Sumo in some major respects:
- The Sumo Amp will never work with Mosfets, because the Sumo ist controlling the base current of output BJTs only (see Bongiorno patent). The necessary gate-source voltage for biasing the output Mosfets is not present.
- The Sumo uses 2 different potentiometers, connected to a voltage potential, for setting the quiescent current of the output stage. The amp from Mr. Bloehbaum (see test) uses 1 variabel current source only for setting the quiescent current of the 2 floating output stages. That is a major step forward in biasing a DC-coupled circlotron.
- The Sumo amp is limited from about 40 (nine) to about 70 (nine+) Watts rms (4 Ohm) only due to its inherent structure. The new Thorens Amp delivers 400 Watts rms at 4 Ohm and is absolutely stable at 2 Ohm loads. This power is never possible with the Sumo amp structure.
- The new amp is fully DC-coupled and uses 6 tubes in the voltage amplifier and driver stage. That would never be possible with the Sumo structure because the termal drift of the tube working points would cause unwanted current flows in the output stage in terms of many Amperes.
- The Sumo amp has a sudden switch point from class-A to class-AB which definately causes audible distortions. The very good near constant slope of the harmonic spectral curves of the new Thorens amp would never be possible with the Sumo amp structure.

arcolette
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2006, 01:56 AM   #77
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Default Re: new amp is a circlotron but different to Sumo

Quote:
Originally posted by Arcolette
From my point of view this new amp is different to the Sumo in some major respects...
Arcolette,

Thanks for the link and for your comments. I certainly agree that the Thorens amp is not identical to the Sumo. I continue to see it as based on the same basic topology, but I make this comparison only as an aid to understanding, not to detract from the later design in any way or to suggest that it trades unfairly on the Bongiorno patent (which has expired in any case). If you compare the schematics of these amps to most of what's out there, you may see why I think of them as relatively similar.

As mentioned earlier, I believe that the Thorens is using a pair of vertical MOSFETs biased by a temperature-compensated current source. I'm sure it sounds great with a tube voltage gain section, but for what it's worth, you could get the same power output using a discrete solid-state front end (see example at post #64).

P.S. - Is an English translation available for the review article you linked to above?
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2006, 03:00 AM   #78
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southwest
Joe,

Have you breadboarded post #64 and what would be a good jfet
for the front end?
I have some VFETS (SIT) depletion that I could use for the outputs.
The biasing scheme would be different because of the depletion
VFETS.

2sk60

sdman
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2006, 06:20 AM   #79
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
"The Sumo amp is limited from about 40 (nine) to about 70 (nine+) Watts rms (4 Ohm) only due to its inherent structure. "

The 9+ does 120W at 4 ohms.

" This power is never possible with the Sumo amp structure."

The base current set can be increased to put out any amount of power that you want for low impedances, there is enough transformer, heatsink, and outputs to drive down to 1 ohm if you wish.

"The Sumo amp has a sudden switch point from class-A to class-AB which definately causes audible distortions. "

Yours may be adjusted wrong, I don't have that problem with mine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2006, 07:44 AM   #80
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Germany
Hallo djk,

“The 9+ does 120W at 4 ohms.”

I talked about rms Watts, you too? My amp delivers 60W rms at 4 ohms and 95W rms at 8 ohms only. The available output power strongly depends on the current gain of the output transistors and on the transfer characteristic of these transistors and verys from amp to amp. The higher the output current the lower the current gain (Ic/Ib) of these transistors as usual with BJTs. But the base current is fixed by the structure of this amp and can increase linearly with the output voltage only – at first hand looking. That is much too low for higher output power or in better terms higher output current (because the current gain drops rapidly with collector current). For this reason the Sumo has 2 additional diodes and 2 current limiting resistors connected from the output terminals to ground. This circuit opens a current path whenever the output voltage reaches the forward voltage drop of these diodes (+/- 0.7 V to ground). This additional current delivers the necessary base current for higher output loads. But even this is only good for about 40W rms at 4 ohms (Sumo 9). Bongiorno discovered that and added the very clever designed additional current circuit including 2 pnp small signal transistors. These transistors add (switch!) a third current path at an output power of about 10W rms at 4 ohms. How much power is possible at the end depends from your used power BJTs. But with 5 output transistors and all the other used circuits it is never possible to drive a 1 ohm load sufficiently due to its inherent current limiting functionality.

“ The base current set can be increased to put out any amount of power that you want for low impedances, there is enough transformer, heatsink, and outputs to drive down to 1 ohm if you wish.”

No, I fully disagree. See my notes above. The circuit works inherent current limiting. Increasing the output current means adding a lot(!) of additional power output transistors and additional circuits for delivering the necessary base current. One has to increase the quiescent current of the output transistors to at least 1 A per transistor. That would cause way too much heat and the driving circuit is not able to deliver the necessary base current. I made some simulations and they delivered exactly the same results. Even by using most modern BJTs with a fairly good Ic/Ib ratio (MJL3281A as an example) does not solve this structural problem.

Regarding the switching effects you wrote: “ Yours may be adjusted wrong, I don't have that problem with mine.”

No, the switching problem has nothing to do with adjustments. There are 2 base current paths for Sumo 9 and 3 for Sumo 9+. Only one is stable, the other ones are switched suddenly depending on output voltage and current (see my comments above). The second current path is switched at about 0.7 Volts refering to ground or 1.4 Volts across the load (speaker) with the mentioned diode circuit. The third circuit incorporating the additional pnp transistors in Sumo 9+ switch at about 10 Watts rms at 4 Ohms (depending on current gain ratio of output transistors). I do not like any switching which depends on output power. That is never a good idea for a no-compromise good sounding amplifier because it definitely has bad effects onto the output signal. Please take your time and make a simulation, you will clearly see this effect. Another drawback is that the performance of this circuit strongly depends on the near perfect matching of 10(!) output power transistors. That is a very high effort for an amplifier which has to make large compromises (switching!) to reach a fairly amount of output power.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SUMO Andromeda II bias or idle power? SQLGuy Solid State 6 23rd November 2011 03:55 PM
SUMO Polaris Class A/B Stereo Power AMP (New to the Board) thecavernut Solid State 12 15th November 2009 10:15 PM
Help! Save my Sumo "The Power" power amp. Chris Dian Solid State 15 11th January 2009 10:36 AM
Sumo The Power Schematic Alex helge Solid State 10 12th May 2005 10:37 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Page generated in 0.13016 seconds (83.67% PHP - 16.33% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio