|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hof,Norway with Nice Mountains!
|
Any site where i can find amplifier project that starts all
in Class A mode but with Output stage in Class AB. I have trafos and Caps from a SAE mkIII amp and also a 2x650VA trafo with 2x27,5V AC (Very Strong & heavy indeed!!) Regards, ManUtd |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Nearly all power amplifier designs are class A except for
the output stage which is nearly always class aB. So take your choice of most of the designs out there. Unless I'm missing something ? /sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
Previous post was what I was going to say except to add that you might want to check in to the question of Clas AB vs. pure Class B for the output stage. AB sounds like a good idea, but there is body of opinion that has an essential flaw that offsets the benefits with the result that pure B output stages workout a bit better.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Notice that I used a small a for class aB.
In my book : class B has no bias and exhibits bad crossover distortion. class aB has optimum bias for minimum distortion. class AB means running part of the output deliberately in class A, above the requirements for aB - I don't really want to go into the distortion consequences here as it wasn't part of the question, and also depends on how much is A and how much is B. We are really talking about what is pure class B and how class B differs from class C. I tend to go with historical acceptance, I believe its Doug Self that claimed unbiased class B was really Class C, but this ignores the fact that classical class C in radio circuits only conducts for half ! the cycle, so I only agree with him in the pedantic sense. In the historical sense class B usually refers to bipolar motor controllers with no bias, i.e. very low static dissipation. Whatever, I say class aB, you say pure class B, same thing. class A enhanced class B wasn't part of the question (yet!), so let's leave it there ? /sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nottingham, England
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Heavy class AB is best in my opinion, and I design the majority of my power amps that way. There 'can' be a problem with the crossover from class A to class B. I first found this out 35 years ago, when I used too large of value emitter resistors in my first personal amp design. Heck, I thought that 1 ohm with a .5A standing current was OK, but NOOOOO! Actually I should have used a .05 ohm resistor or so, for best transition. This is because an emitter follower, when voltage driven, prefers a small emitter resistor that equates to about .015-.025V when the amp is idling. The problem with this solution, is that thermal runaway of the output stage is possible, UNLESS you do your bias thermal compensation right. Still, it is possible to get an almost perfect transition from class A to class AB if you do it right.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
I'm quite happy to argue the various merits of AB topologies
but given the original question I think its fairly pointless here. /sreten.P.S. I perfectly understand JC's post, but its not simple to explain, and IMO not really relevant to the the original post. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: US
|
Quote:
I have read about that value (15-25mv) here and somewhere else (in an Iq control IC from Linear I think but 30mv is also used). I never understood why that's case tho. Any rationale for it, John or anybody else? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
Anyway getting back to the original question, here are two kits described as class AB
http://info.hobbyengineering.com/specs/DIY-k48.pdf or http://www.aksaonline.com Actually, I'm not sure there are all that many expressly Class-AB diy projects published although there are exables of Class A or Class B amps biased into AB (deliberately or otherwise). AB seems a lot more common anong tube amp builders. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
Steven |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Testing Class B Output stage | Mark245 | Solid State | 7 | 27th January 2009 11:23 AM |
| Aikido + class D in the output stage | jmartins | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 6th June 2006 09:51 PM |
| CCS for PP Class A output stage? | AudioGeek | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 24th January 2004 03:58 PM |
| Class A output stage for CD Player | PTSOUNDLAB | Digital Source | 0 | 30th December 2001 01:04 PM |
| Class h or g output stage? | Opie | Solid State | 1 | 24th October 2001 10:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15025 seconds (72.63% PHP - 27.37% MySQL) with 10 queries |