Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th November 2003, 08:33 PM   #121
PMA is offline PMA  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
PMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
Non-feedback class AB? There must be a Gm doubling area (i.e. for smaller output voltages the gain is different than for higher output voltages, resulting in a kind of cross-over distortion).
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 08:38 PM   #122
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Talking Ducks?

Quote:
Originally posted by john curl
Folks, please get your ducks in a row about this circuit.
Ducks???
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 08:44 PM   #123
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Default Re: The hard way....is the best way :)

Quote:
Originally posted by Fred Dieckmann
"I think perhaps we're both saying the same thing from differant points in the design cycle.........mike"

No we are not. You are have to sort through a lot of jfets to find a specific Idss.
Matching a couple Jfets for Idss greater than the desired bias current value and putting a trim pot to select to desired current is so much easier, that this is a no brainer. Sort a through few dozen Jfets to find a specific value and you will find out the hard way.......
Perhaps my QC is a little laxer than yours. I look for fairly symetrical clipping and leave it at that. AND I'm not doing any quantities, so I'll continue this way. I do not like trimpots.
I can always take the rejects from 1 amp and adjust (fixed) resistors on the next and recycle that way. So far this method works for me, but thanks for the input...........mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 08:50 PM   #124
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Quote:
Originally posted by PMA
Non-feedback class AB? There must be a Gm doubling area (i.e. for smaller output voltages the gain is different than for higher output voltages, resulting in a kind of cross-over distortion).
Yes, but it specs OK (for me) and sounds delightfull. The lack of feedback does something magical that swamps out any other shortcomings (IMO) ....... I'm surprised no one has mentioned the output capacitor ..... A bone of contention for many
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 08:59 PM   #125
PRR is offline PRR  United States
diyAudio Member
 
PRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
> I still think that a gate resistor of maybe the 100 ohm to 1K is not a bad idea

The circuit which brought-out this side-discussion has a 390Ω impedance at the Gate.

If you can build it compact, with Gate very-close to that resistor, there's no need for an added resistor.

If you can't build it compact, you are liable to more troubles than a simple stopper can cure.

> Voicing the sound of tube circuits by the value of the grid resistor is a pretty well know design trick.

Yes, in part because R-C coupling tends to overload badly. Adding a few K of resistance in the Grid has little impact on the undistorted sound but a major effect on overload behavior for highly transient signals (speech/music). Adding grid resistance also lowers HF gain or feedback, which is a "voicing".

> I find that well damped circuits at RF frequencies often sound better and more consistent.

This may be true. I would wonder though why any RF is running around my circuit. Perhaps it has stability or shielding problems, and perhaps fixing that would be a better path. Yes, RF stability is a real dark hole for most audio designers, who must either schedule a second career in RF engineering or just apply band-aids.

> I think these values shouldn't have too much effect on line level and power amps noise figures.

Agreed. Some, since we know the ear is a pretty sensitive organ. But not a lot, and generally lost in the haze of other noise sources. (Preamp design is different.) And as you note, a typical JFET has more noise than a 1K resistor (which figures, considering its Gm).

In large power MOSFETs, Gate resistance is provably bad. See Pass's notes on Zen amps: the Gate capacitance is large and non-linear, and a few K of Gate resistance can make distortion rise several percent in the top of the audio band. Small JFETs have this effect, but much-much less, and a K or two is probably not going to be your biggest distortion source.

> has to be selected, but selected for what?

As noted, so bias current for V-LED/2 is appropriate and reasonable.

In Mass Production, that is intolerable. Who has time to sort and label production parts, much less stock sorted spare parts and deal with home-repairs using the "right" part but not properly selected? Even selecting or trimming source resistors is a pain. I remember bad old days like that, and I am glad they are gone.

For home-brew, or high-price boutique gear, selection can give "better" results than robust use-any-part design. It does mean more hassle in building and repairing, so you better be sure the results are worth it. For many people here, it probably is (unless you have to buy 20 parts to get 2 that work as hoped).
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 09:00 PM   #126
PMA is offline PMA  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
PMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
I have nothing against non-global feedback amps (you will find one of them, class A, on my web pages). But I do prefer lower distortion and higher damping factor, and higher output power as well

Pavel
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 09:35 PM   #127
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Default SE class A SS

..
Attached Images
File Type: gif sea.gif (4.1 KB, 562 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 09:37 PM   #128
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
got the outputs drawn wrong .... sources should go to rails
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 09:38 PM   #129
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
and devices switched
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2003, 09:46 PM   #130
Bricolo is offline Bricolo  France
diyAudio Member
 
Bricolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
would adding a 9.5k between the 2nd input and ground be a good idea? (matching the input impedances)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discrete Dual Differential DAC? dantwomey Digital Source 18 5th March 2011 07:24 AM
single-ended to differential? gentlevoice Digital Line Level 16 17th December 2008 07:18 AM
Single Differential Non-feedback lumanauw Solid State 3 5th September 2004 03:29 AM
Differential to single ended... Bas Horneman Tubes / Valves 21 2nd April 2003 03:05 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Page generated in 0.11951 seconds (80.88% PHP - 19.12% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio