32 output devices ffor 60W in Luxman M800A
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
jcx
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
thanx for the lead to Only Distortion Negative Feedback Circuit

I still can't find a patent number - and the point of patents is that they can't be "secret" - you have to publicize the exact patent you claim is protecting your hardware or lose the right to sue for infringement

if the block diagram is correct representation of Luxman's ODNF then it is described by Horrowitz fig 6.1d “conditional feedback” graph – a topology dating back ~ ½ a century
Attached Images
 odnf00.gif (17.6 KB, 205 views)

 2nd October 2012, 05:42 PM #12 jan.didden   diyAudio Member     Join Date: May 2002 Location: The great city of Turnhout, BE The problem here is to set beta=1/(A*G), because A and G are the distorting entities. If you would know exact what A and G were at all times you could compensate for it and have a distortionless amp. But A and G vary with time, current, voltage, temp, from unit to unit etc so it is impossible to make beta=1/(A*G). Edit: The result they give that (beta*K*G)/(1+beta*K*G)=1 implies that beta*K*G must be infinite. But if K and/or G would be infinite, 'regular' feedback would already give a distortionless amp. In fact, that equation is fundamentally the same as the equation for a 'regular' feedback amp Acl=Aol/(1+beta*Aol) and assuming that Aol is infinite. jan didden __________________ Cable: a potential source of trouble interconnecting two other potential sources of trouble - Erik Margan Linear Audio pubs and articles . The SilentSwitcher now at diyaudio store SilentSwitcher. Keeping in touch with SY. Last edited by jan.didden; 2nd October 2012 at 05:48 PM.
 2nd October 2012, 05:48 PM #13 Struth   Banned   Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: books at londonpower.com Hi Guys The Luxman ODNF is nominally designed as a "zero feedback" amplifier. The main forward path is via linearised open-loop stages (free running) that drive one side of the output stage. A secondary path monitors the output DC and signal and drives the other half of the output stage. The output stage itself is four piars of complimentary BJTs plus drives, predrivers and bias. For the higher powered models, two or more output blocks are paralleled. With an openloop output stage, the output impedance comes down to the emitter resistor values more or less. To reduce z-out, more devices in parallel means the R-Es are paralleled and openloop z-out goes down. Of course, paralleling output devices allows each to work less hard into a given load which reduces large signal nonlinearities within each output, and also within the driver. Paralleling also smooths out gain variations. The normal flaw with openloop output stages is that z-out is high, even though it is fairly constant for a wider frequency range than when enclosed in a typical feedback loop. Paralleling reduces z-out while retaining the flatness versus frequency. It should be said that with a wide bandwidth circuit, feedback around the output stage can provide flat z-out vs. freq. All the circuitry in the Luxman is said to be very wide bandwidth. Some of the attention to detail is a bit nutty but quaintly Japanese and audiophylic. Spreading the heat over many devices improves reliability. Building your own amp does not require any linear relation between output device quantity and power per se. You presumably have a known speaker to drive, a known loudness level you wish to achieve, and therefore a very constrained and easy goal. A decision to run the output stage openloop will effect device quantity if you want good damping. You could also look at the topology as having two parallel paths, since both monitor the input but only one monitors the output. The path signals are mixed at the predriver input. Part of the stated goal is to eliminate caps within the circuitry - at least to eliminate a dominant-pole cap that would limit high-freq performance. Another important feature of this circuit is that it is operated class-A. The emitter-follower output stage has a wide crossover region that is easier to deal with using feedback and becomes flatter with more devices paralleled. Class-A nominally eliminates all crossover distortion and further flattens the gain and performance at low output levels. Have fun Kevin O'Connor londonpower.com Last edited by Struth; 2nd October 2012 at 05:55 PM.
 2nd October 2012, 06:21 PM #14 evette   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jun 2006 Wayne THe # of output trannies has nothing to do with efficiency,,only SOA> evette
 2nd October 2012, 08:15 PM #15 Struth   Banned   Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: books at londonpower.com Hi Guys As Luxman states about the amps of this line, power doubles as load impedance drops to a half, with doubling continued down to 2R or 4R depending on the model. The high currents required for these lower impedances demands more output transistors. Personally I like the topology even if it may be slightly misrepresented as altogether new. The assembly is certainly beautiful and the Luxman site is very well done. Luxman products have always had class. The original poster should enjoy the amp for the musical result. Making that enjoyment conditional on certain technical details of design does not help. There was an assumption about the output devices made by the original poster that is a common one for hobbyists unfamiliar with component ratings. Just because you see an application where a given device is used in, say a single pair to produce 100W output, does not mean the device is a "100W device". People do this with tubes more often than BJTs or mosfets. Applications are just that: an example of how one might use the part. The example does not usually represent a limitation of use or of performance in an actual amplifier. You can always use 'big' tubes or 'big' transistors in a low-watt amplifier. Have fun Kevin O'Connor londonpower.com
 2nd October 2012, 09:00 PM #16 jcx   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: .. I think it is important on a DIY site to have accurate information on design techniques, especially any "inherent limits" that no amount of tweaking can ever improve on feedback theory has some of these unavoidable requirements and limits so being able to classify a "design innovation" described in vague marketing speak as fitting strictly within feedback theory is valuable to prevent enthusiastic DIYers from chasing nonexistent/physically impossible ideals the marketing people are using to sell product such as “Distortion Only Feedback” the ODNF diagram shows a "eye candy" redrawing of the simple error feedback amp that is the basic circuit of feedback theory as such it has loop gain, feedback factor, relations for stability, output impedance that are the same as any other error feedback amplifier recognizing this doesn't take anything away from the amp's design, implementation or performance - just helps to keep the credulous informed that they really need to understand 50 year old feedback theory to evaluate some marketing claims Last edited by jcx; 2nd October 2012 at 09:05 PM.
 3rd October 2012, 06:29 PM #17 muddasirwaheedmalik   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2010 Dear all, This leads back to my qusestion.....if i simply double or triple the output devices of my current amplifier keeping the same total bias current (approximately) within the same heat sink would it lower distortion or improve linearity?????DIY route???
 3rd October 2012, 06:50 PM #18 jcx   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: .. better to increase output device count at the same or greater bias per device - MOSFET like as much bias as you can afford BJT "optimum bias" is scarey low - Self goes to considerable lengths to stabilize it against output Q temp changes most of our other designers here recommend higher bias for BJT as well - it seems to be better to extend the "gm doubling" region to cover "the first watt" in Class A
TonyTecson
diyAudio Moderator

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palatiw, Pasig City
Quote:
 Originally Posted by muddasirwaheedmalik Dear all, This leads back to my question.....if i simply double or triple the output devices of my current amplifier keeping the same total bias current (approximately) within the same heat sink would it lower distortion or improve linearity?????DIY route???
imho yes, because more output trannies means each one is operating at lower current than before, heating is is lowered and shared between more outputs......
__________________
planet10 needs your help: Let's help Ruth and Dave...http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/plane...ml#post5010547[B

 4th October 2012, 12:09 AM #20 jcx   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: .. each device is underbiased by the multiple factor if the original was "optimal" - you do have the possibilty of reducing distortion at large currents if beta droop were an issue - but a low order distortion at large signal levels is not very audibble compared to messing up crossover and low level linearity it is also unlikely the pre existing power supply is able to drive added multiple transistors at multiples of the previous peak current to be able to take advantage of more output devices so unless the amp is already running Class A, and/or has oversized power supply I don't think multiplying output devices in an existing amp whithout increasing total bias current is likely to be very useful Last edited by jcx; 4th October 2012 at 12:26 AM.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         Dx Classic Amplifiers         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post fn9mm Chip Amps 5 28th August 2011 12:37 PM Curly Woods Tubes / Valves 0 23rd July 2009 02:18 PM cloud Pass Labs 11 10th November 2008 11:37 PM Mr Evil Class D 42 12th January 2005 02:18 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 PM.