|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
|
A class B amplifier is a distorted (crossover distortion) , but efficient version of a Class A amplifier.
So, considering a guitar amplifier......is it always best done in Class A (from a sound point of view, not efficiency)? ....Also, if done in class B, can you use DSPs at the pre-amp stage to entirely get rid of the crossover distortion? ....Also, Class AB is to make class B like class A.......but is it possible to do a "Class BBBBA" amplifier, which is very similar to a class B, but slightly dabbling into class A.......ie, with the transistors slightly ,(very slightly) biased on when on no load) .....has the designer complete choice over the degree of "Class A" that he/she puts into the class AB amplifier? |
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
It needs not be. An accurate class B amplifier can be perfect: see example below
Quote:
Quote:
It is a mongrel, and always creates unwanted artifacts. Class AC of J. Broskie is a better solution (but a hot one). Another option is a sliding bias class A, like the Circlophone.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Hi all.
As I understand it, The various classes of amplifiers were adopted with tubes and various tubes were designed to work optimally in a specific class. For Audio power the choice was single tube class A, push-pull class B. Specific grid characteristics were designed for the tubes to work optimally in a specific class. A typical class B tube was the 6N7, a dual power triode. Then came the power petodes and beam-power pentodes, those tubes worked best in something between class A and class B and class AB was adopted. The 6L6 and the 6V6 were tubes in those last categories. The class B category tubes had characteristics that were quite linear over most of the grid characteristic, but deviated with a curved bow just before cutoff. By biasing a second tube to pick up where the other cut off, the output was still pretty linear. Class AB became the class where both tubes in a push-pull pair contributed equally to the output at low power, By tweaking the the grid-wire spacing ever so slightly it was possible to get very high performance in the crossover region where both tubes contributed about equally. Along come transistors, first "bipolar" transistors and later FETs. Using solid state devices it was much more difficult to tweak the transfer function to fit the application better. Class A was too hot and the transistors burned up. Class B was better, but because the cut-off characteristic was much sharper and hard to match the term crossover distortion was invented. Crossover distortion is due to the difficulties of crossing over from producing output power controlled by one transistor to producing output power with a second transistor seamlessly. Crossover distortion is quite audible even at quite low percentage levels because it is such an un-natural type of distortion. People simply do not like that type of distortion. There is a second equally disturbing effect from using solid state circuits in class B push pull. The solid state devices are high current, low voltage devices, whereas tubes are high voltage low current devices. At high currents power supplies ring and that causes havoc in amplifiers. Power-supplies are supposed to have little, or no, effects on an amplifiers performance. It took several 10ns of years before design engineers learned how to bypass and wire supplies. This last problem may very well be why solid state amplifiers got a bad reputation among Audio-Files in the beginning. Amplifiers produced sounds that nobody had heard before and that ruined the reputation of many amplifier constructions. Lots of rambling about amplifier classes and stuff. Have a good day, Hans J Weedon Last edited by HJWeedon; 26th September 2012 at 01:28 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Class-AB meets Class-D: Yamaha's EEEngine Topology - where are this Diy Projects? | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 19 | 3rd May 2013 05:31 PM |
| Collection of Class B topologies <100mA Idle and Sound closest by Class A | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 37 | 27th July 2012 08:04 AM |
| Can a Class AB PP amp be said to be operating in Class A at low signal levels? | ray_moth | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 23rd January 2009 07:52 PM |
| How about a round-up of Class A kit power amps, or collectable vintage class A? | Brisso57 | Solid State | 4 | 14th February 2007 10:30 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |