Front end help - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th September 2012, 06:18 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
Default Front end help

hello.
Would somone please tell me the name of the front end topology of this amplifier?

Best Regards Mark
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tang.JPG (100.5 KB, 247 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012, 07:07 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
jkuetemann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Paris, Ontario
I suppose one could call it 'Symmetrical Differential'. It's just two normal resistively loaded LTPs of opposing polarity.
__________________
---Jason Kuetemann---
When the student is ready, the master appears.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012, 07:23 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
Thankyou Jason.
could you tell me the main pros and cons of such a configration . compared to a sigle LTP??
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012, 09:51 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, on the east coast
I think that's an attempt at a push-pull VAS (Q7,8) as well. You will see this in many high-end commercial designs where symmetry is the approach to a certain sound quality (H2 prominent) and, of course, the aesthetics too. e.g. Rotel have favoured it consistently.
__________________
regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2012, 04:41 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
jkuetemann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Paris, Ontario
I think as Ian mentioned the double LTP is generally used for driving a 'push-pull' VAS. The symmetry, if well executed, seems to offer what some might say a palatable character to the sound. A certain amount of harmonic cancellation can be achieved this way. Cons as I see them really amount to added complexity. One could achieve really nice results without basically doing everything in the front end x2.
__________________
---Jason Kuetemann---
When the student is ready, the master appears.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2012, 05:22 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
Thanks Ian .
This amplifier is from a budget range. yes the layout is quite symetrical too. if the componets where soldered in with some care it wouldlook pretty good. Asafter a few mods it is sounding much better . i have disconected the Preamp / control PCB as it was noisey and strangled the sound . I have also removed the dc blocking cap from the input of the power amp as my dac has no or ver yvery little dc on its output. That made a big diffrence most noticable was a much welcome reduction in sibulance type distortion .
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2012, 05:42 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
Hi Jason
Added complexity normally means added cost or so i thought. Im guessing it is an attempt to steal away business from the more prominent manufacturers. inside does look quite tidy compared to others i have seen in this price range ... A couple of questions . This amp runs cool very cool and the heatsink is very small too . I suspect it is running a quite low bias . maybe it could be increased . Also i dont see any compensation capacitors well that is if i ignore the two 100nF film caps . if the 100nF caps are for compensation are they not quite high in value as normslly i see the caps with only say 30 pF in these. C4 and C5 are the capacitors in question.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2012, 06:20 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
in the above post i mention 100nf it should be 100pF
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2012, 01:57 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Default Benefits of complementary LTP.

1. Potential for reduction in input noise by up to 3dB.
2. Can be easier to control DC offset with cancellation of input currents - dependant on effort to match complementary Hfes.
3. Potential to reduce distortion.
4. Easy way to drive push-pull VAS.
5. It looks nice - to many people at least

There are drawbacks too. See Bob Cordell's book for a more detailed analysis. He is not a real fan of this layout.

Best wishes
David
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2012, 04:15 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
jkuetemann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Paris, Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by madtecchy View Post
Hi Jason
Added complexity normally means added cost or so i thought. Im guessing it is an attempt to steal away business from the more prominent manufacturers. inside does look quite tidy compared to others i have seen in this price range ... A couple of questions . This amp runs cool very cool and the heatsink is very small too . I suspect it is running a quite low bias . maybe it could be increased . Also i dont see any compensation capacitors well that is if i ignore the two 100nF film caps . if the 100nF caps are for compensation are they not quite high in value as normslly i see the caps with only say 30 pF in these. C4 and C5 are the capacitors in question.
Small signal stage costs are generally small compared to power supply, heat sink and chassis. It adds to the aesthetic and make some people feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Q8 looks like the emitter and collector are reversed. C4 and C5 would be plain old miller compensation caps and 100pF isn't necessarily out of line, depending on LTP and VAS currents. The emitter resistor values in the VAS degeneration also don't appear correct, and are not equal.

Also absent is any emitter degeneration of the LTP and an input filter. The feedback network values look suspect (40dB gain) and there is no input resistor to allow for bias currents.

As for bias, it may well be somewhat low. If the heat sink is particularly small I wouldn't try to bias it too heavily. Typical values for 'optimal bias' puts about 26mV across each resistor R26 and R23. Trying to make the class A region too big will result in a hot amplifier and gm doubling which some say is every bit as bad as under-biasing.

Is it safe to assume you have drawn this by tracing the physical circuit? That might explain some of the discrepancies...
__________________
---Jason Kuetemann---
When the student is ready, the master appears.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has anyone seen this front-end before? Edmond Stuart Solid State 1135 22nd January 2014 11:52 AM
Bogen Front End lpd Tubes / Valves 2 5th March 2008 04:12 AM
My New Front End Pics! micb Car Audio 1 26th May 2006 02:26 PM
Noisily front end mantistube Analogue Source 10 16th January 2006 01:57 AM
Front end for sub amp mashaffer Solid State 9 22nd July 2005 03:35 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2