|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
|
If I bias a pair of complementary mosfet outputs up to where I get satisfactory xover characteristics (but they run too hot)....Say 100ma. :
Then double the devices (2 pairs) and either bias them down or add source resistors to get the current down to 50ma (per pair) then can I expect the same xover characteristics ? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
First order (thumb in wind) approximation:
yes. But truly, Mosfet like a lot more current than that. If you're intent on low bias, I suggest Bipolar devices. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
"If I bias a pair of complementary mosfet outputs up to where I get satisfactory xover characteristics (but they run too hot)....Say 100ma. :"
If you had a ±50V supply for a 100W amplifier then 100mA bias would be only 5W per power supply rail. If this is too hot you have no heatsink. Look at some ready made amplifiers (not receivers, they try and save money in this area) to get an idea of the amount of heatsink you will need. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
|
>But truly, Mosfet like a lot more current than that. If you're
>intent on low bias, I suggest Bipolar devices. These are Hitachi lateral devices, and they "seem" OK with fairly low bias. (observing xover notch w/ 10kHz squarewave). The strange thing (perhaps you can shed some light?) is that unlike bipolar devices (xover notch is worst at lowest levels) the notch seems to manifest as the amplitude of the signals goes up. Worst case right before clipping? Thank You .......... mike |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
|
>If this is too hot you have no heatsink.
I'm trying to utilize "board level" heatsinks. So, yes a little skimpy in that area. Hence my original question to see if an array of smaller heatsinks (and devices) can operate like a single more massive unit...........Thanks............mike |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The one and only
|
In the case of Mosfets of a particular process, they tend to
act the same for given die area. Two devices of a given chip size look a lot like a single die whose area twice as large. Thus an IRF250 looks a lot like two IRF240's. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Protection diodes on DSD/PCM-1792/94 current-outputs? | Der Dude | Digital Line Level | 4 | 30th January 2009 12:25 PM |
| Sunfire Signature power amp current source outputs | rhapsodee | Solid State | 0 | 3rd December 2008 03:15 PM |
| Sharing current through diodes | rtarbell | Parts | 1 | 3rd April 2007 03:49 PM |
| Current-Sharing on the DOZ Amp | EchoWars | Solid State | 9 | 3rd November 2004 01:20 AM |
| Sharing DAC outputs | Prune | Digital Source | 0 | 22nd January 2004 10:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09794 seconds (76.05% PHP - 23.95% MySQL) with 10 queries |