SONY Is it really true? - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th June 2012, 12:07 AM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
142W@10% is about the same as 108W@1%
108W into 3R is 40W into 8R, assuming they are assuming stiff power rails (which they do to cheat)
So it is a 40W amplifier.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2012, 12:14 AM   #12
cbdb is offline cbdb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Berry View Post
Total power consumption of 160 watts says it all.
Ditto! The usual creative specs for low end home theatre units.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 05:19 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
The ratings are more likely made up, rather than calculated using cheating methods. If it were to be measured properly, it would probably only be able to output about 10 watts per channel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 05:23 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
One reason i would never ever buy a consumer amplifier newer than early 90's.

Its also the main reason why i stick to diy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2012, 04:34 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
DCPreamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
I was in Fiji last year and was quite amused by the consumer electronics sold there. Being from the USA, I'm pretty used to audio gear ratings being *somewhat* realistic. But when I saw an all-in-one shelf receiver/amp/mp3/DVD/surround system with a big sticker on the front saying "7,600 Watts," I literally laughed-out-loud. It was about a foot-cubed and weighed maybe 10 pounds. It was a brand I'd never seen before. Much of the gear sold over there was equally atrocious with ridiculous ratings - also mostly brands I've never seen before.

After seeing that, a Sony with a rating 50% over actual, or maybe even accurate when driven to an intolerable distortion level, it doesn't seem that bad.
__________________
"Believers cling to the myth despite the evidence, reinterpret the myth to suit the evidence, or lie about the evidence to support the myth." "To err is human; to blame errors on external factors is even more so."
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IS THIS TRUE? mclsound Multi-Way 25 1st January 2012 03:46 PM
Is it really true!? humlan57 Full Range 10 11th January 2010 10:47 PM
is this true???? kathodyne Tubes / Valves 16 29th January 2006 10:26 AM
Is this true? josefr Digital Source 3 9th April 2003 09:28 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2