Big difference in amps - tag/rotel has me confused - Page 5 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th June 2012, 06:20 PM   #41
weskoki is offline weskoki  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
weskoki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by homemodder View Post
This is strange, back in 1993 or 1994 it was one of the top amps to buy at the price range of 350 pounds and below. It recieved 5 star status in publications like What Hifi. It was later dethroned by the Marantz ki signature amps. I have three and I love them, a little tweaking makes them even better, sorry but the Self style amps do sound a little bland in comparison and needs lots of messing about to get nice sound out of them.
The best appraisel I found of this amp was when pitted against the older AKSA amp on a internet page, here the author just plainly said at the end that the aksa was nice but completly outclassed by the 970BX and it was more expensive. Makes one think..... and proves different strokes for different folks.
Rotel 970BX better than Aksa I don't think so.
The 970BX was the worst amp i had in my set up.Honestly worst sound
i have heard.No sound stage,you hear the speakers separately,weak dynamics,real lo-fi.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2012, 08:59 PM   #42
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: York
I have not heard the Aksa but had the 960,970,971 and a mix of norm ax and bx. I was using a stack of them to mono bloc and bi amp my surround set up in uni. Think I had ten of them at 1 point.

The 991 was so much better it was in a different league in every way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2012, 03:34 AM   #43
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Mono and bi-amping would eliminate the Rotel supply rejection weaknesses
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2012, 11:32 AM   #44
diyAudio Member
 
Nico Ras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of South Africa
How many Rotel 970BX were sold and from there one may conclude that the sales were due to the Rotel 970BX being an excellent sounding amp or an extremely cheap amp.

I concur with sgrossklass everything on the internet is true, also if it cannot be found on the internet it does not exist.
__________________
Kindest regards
Nico
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2012, 12:15 PM   #45
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: York
If the 970 wasn't good I would not have bought so many.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WANTED : Rotel Preamp (with Remote) & Rotel Power Amps - Working or NOT dtm1962 Swap Meet 7 18th December 2012 07:45 PM
New to Valve Amps and Confused??? paulluvsmusic Tubes / Valves 6 27th September 2009 08:46 AM
Is the big difference of L15RLY compare to W15CY ? fdw412 Multi-Way 1 12th April 2009 11:31 AM
Big sale thread: PHL, Raven, Amps, In-wall/ceiling speakers, Amps, VideoRequest mbcouple Swap Meet 2 27th October 2008 11:27 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2