|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#471 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
So you will also use SMS BJT´s, i asume BC850, BC860.
|
|
|
|
#472 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
I know that. I could easily remove it from the circuit.
And pass all data on to you. I do not believe it is a good idea to have bias difference in the parts of the circuit taking care of all the work (i.e. feedback) because that we want to set offset and idle current. I see no point in building it from my point of view, when this part is not present. As i have made it, it can always been disabled. |
|
|
|
#473 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Sonnya you've said that you want the input bias to be independant of output bias setting, because using only master bias trimmers for both, would cause different and uncertain sonic signature, without possibility to find a sweet spot for each of them. With introducing Sziklais in TSSA Basic, bias current in input gain transistors is fixed by Vbe/Rbe, in that way we simply avoid the need of separate bias settings (input bias is fixed in this case) and master bias/offset trimers in pos/neg CCS would be just fine.
You also mentioned that maybe, bacause of better sound, Sziklais will be omitted later, and only cascoded input pair would be present. For this situation your separate bias/offset CCS-s would again be needed to enable independant bias setting for both stages. Hopefully you find my explanation to be satisfactory, regards Andrej
|
|
|
|
#474 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Did i say that i want to remove it ? No !
You and me are the only ones that build this animal. I say that this is such a different toplogy that we really have to study this in detail. Even it´s creator may not understand it 100 %. Art comes before science because intuition is faster then understanding. I think that is where LC is really good at. |
|
|
|
#475 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
![]() Ok, then we got this straighten out!
|
|
|
|
#476 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
![]() Dual layer PCB also enables the SMT parts to be mounted in bottom layer below regular parts mounted on top layer. In that case we have possibility to significanly reduce PCB size, traces lenghts, etc. |
|
|
|
|
#477 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
I will go to bed.
|
|
|
|
#478 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, SMD lends to 3D.
|
|
|
|
#479 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
I was afraid than any one would make shorts while soldering them.
|
|
|
|
#480 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This amp is for the chosen few. No capabilty - No amp
i think that is fair |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| simplest amplifier possible with BJT's? | rmgvs | Solid State | 123 | 10th July 2008 03:05 AM |
| Symmetrical Phono Amplifier | seroxatmad | Solid State | 3 | 6th August 2007 04:00 PM |
| Simplest class B Amplifier | PicancoNet | Solid State | 42 | 8th June 2005 02:55 PM |
| Symmetrical amplifier conundrum | Kilentra | Solid State | 22 | 31st January 2003 05:06 AM |
| Symmetrical 400W amplifier | Diogo | Solid State | 30 | 28th October 2002 11:00 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |