TSSA - The Simplest Symmetrical Amplifier - Page 27 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th April 2012, 09:58 PM   #261
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
IRF matching, very simple, but it will take you some time hehe

Do not try to find or make a selection of IRF610 and IRF9610 according to Vgs voltage. That is not important. Usually they differentiate for 0,5 V but that is OK as offset setting eliminates this.

Transconductance curves of each type have to be parallel as much as possible. That you will get from three sets of measurements for each type of mosfet. Mark each mosfet with number. Start with 1 by IRF610 and the same with IRF9610.

IRF610 step 1
- take first IRF610 and set potentiometer that you read 100 ohm, read out Vgs and record the value as Vgs-initial-610
- leave potentiometer as it is and measure all other IRF610
- for each numbered IRF610 put a measured resistance value at initial Vgs in a table chart

IRF610 step 2
- take first IRF610 and set potentiometer that you read 50 ohm, read out Vgs and record the value as Vgs-medium-610
- leave potentiometer as it is and measure all other IRF610
- for each numbered IRF610 put a measured resistance value at medium Vgs in a table chart

IRF610 step 3
- take first IRF610 and set potentiometer that you read 10 ohm, read out Vgs and record the value as Vgs-maximum-610
- leave potentiometer as it is and measure all other IRF610
- for each numbered IRF610 put a measured resistance value at maximum Vgs in a table chart


IRF9610 step 1
- take first IRF9610 and set potentiometer that you read 100 ohm, read out Vgs and record the value as Vgs-initial-9610
- leave potentiometer as it is and measure all other IRF6910
- for each numbered IRF9610 put a measured resistance value at initial Vgs in a table chart

IRF9610 step 2 (attention)
- take first IRF9610 and set potentiometer to Vgs-medium-9610= Vgs-initial-9610 + (Vgs-medium-610 - Vgs-initial-610), read out and record resitance value in a table chart
- leave potentiometer as it is and measure all other IRF6910
- for each numbered IRF9610 put a measured resistance value at medium Vgs in a table chart

IRF9610 step 3 (attention)
- take first IRF9610 and set potentiometer to Vgs-maximum-9610= Vgs-medium-9610 + (Vgs-maximum-610 - Vgs-medium-610), read out and record resitance value in a table chart
- leave potentiometer as it is and measure all other IRF6910
- for each numbered IRF9610 put a measured resistance value at maximum Vgs in a table chart

From IRF610 and IRF9610 table charts you can select the first pair from the ones that have most similar resistance values at all three Vgs voltages. In this way transconductance curves of the first pair are closely parallel-matched. Second pair is the second most matching combination from all three Vgs measurements, etc.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IRF TEST.jpg (328.3 KB, 454 views)

Last edited by Lazy Cat; 24th April 2012 at 10:04 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 01:42 AM   #262
Jay is offline Jay  Indonesia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
I lost track as of why IRF matching is discussed in this thread. Anyway, I have been waiting for anyone to mention about TSSA-HEXFET. TSSA-HEXFET is very different with other versions of TSSA/SSA. It is very cooperative (and very useful) and the performance is more like the F5 topology than the other SSA versions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 06:11 AM   #263
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
I'm just helping to select mosfet driver for BIGBT which is useful for anyone who will try this kind of output.

Hey Jay which specific hexfet are you interested in?

I didn't have time to work more on a TSSA basic, since I was ocupied with SSA upgrade but I promise I will. If you read the thread you can see that Sonnya and Gerhard already made it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 06:55 AM   #264
diyAudio Member
 
Idefixes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mulhouse - Alsace
Send a message via ICQ to Idefixes
Hi LC new issue : Mouser have different grade for vas : E(hfe 100-200) for KSA and D(hfe 60-120) for KSC....that not top for PNP/NPN matching....
__________________
website : http://audiyofield.wifeo.com/index.php
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 07:28 AM   #265
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idefixes View Post
Hi LC new issue : Mouser have different grade for vas : E(hfe 100-200) for KSA and D(hfe 60-120) for KSC....that not top for PNP/NPN matching....
Yes it is really not the best starting position, but first we have to know few things about (driven) cascodes here. KSA/KSC cascode BJT's hFE in TSSA can hardly influence only to initial DC offset (different voltage drop on R8, R9 as a result of their base current difference), which is in any case calibrated to zero with trimmers.

hFE of KSA/KSC doesn't influence the open loop gain value nor the linearity of TSSA amplifier. Their main job as cascodes is to maintain Vce of VAS gain transistor constant, that results in a reduced power dissipation (stable hFE), constant and smaller Cob (bandwidth extension) of VAS gain BJT. Cascode BJT role is mostly supporting one, main (gain) job here is still on VAS gain transistors (BC550/560C), which have to be matched to be complementary equal.

Last edited by Lazy Cat; 25th April 2012 at 07:31 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 07:37 AM   #266
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Nice supporting circuits you have Idefixes. In a soft-start circuit you could replace R4-R7 with this one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 07:47 AM   #267
diyAudio Member
 
Idefixes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mulhouse - Alsace
Send a message via ICQ to Idefixes
So the main point lay in BC560C/550C matching. We have more room on KSA/KSC as when can calibrate initial DC offset with trimmer, the goal is to not have KSA and KSC at oposite hfe range (60 and 200) but to try to maintain they closed possible to the area 100-120. Have you a cross reference for KSA/KSC maybe 2SC3423/2SA1360 could do the job?

Marc
__________________
website : http://audiyofield.wifeo.com/index.php
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 07:51 AM   #268
diyAudio Member
 
Idefixes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mulhouse - Alsace
Send a message via ICQ to Idefixes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazy Cat View Post
Nice supporting circuits you have Idefixes. In a soft-start circuit you could replace R4-R7 with this one.
That's a good idee as it save a huge place. This could be used to build the speaker protection in the same board as softstart=> results in wiring simplification.

Marc
__________________
website : http://audiyofield.wifeo.com/index.php

Last edited by Idefixes; 25th April 2012 at 07:56 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 07:56 AM   #269
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
To resume IRF matching described in post #261 in short.

IRF matching is reduced to a form similar like finding the most equal "potentiometers", where mechanical scale is set to a certain position by accu & P, at which Ohm-meter readout is recorded for comparison.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 08:02 AM   #270
diyAudio Member
 
Idefixes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mulhouse - Alsace
Send a message via ICQ to Idefixes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazy Cat View Post
To resume IRF matching described in post #261 in short.

IRF matching is reduced to a form similar like finding the most equal "potentiometers", where mechanical scale is set to a certain position by accu & P, at which Ohm-meter readout is recorded for comparison.
Yes LC that was i have understanding from your process description. It's quite clear.

Marc
__________________
website : http://audiyofield.wifeo.com/index.php
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simplest amplifier possible with BJT's? rmgvs Solid State 123 10th July 2008 03:05 AM
Symmetrical Phono Amplifier seroxatmad Solid State 3 6th August 2007 04:00 PM
Simplest class B Amplifier PicancoNet Solid State 42 8th June 2005 02:55 PM
Symmetrical amplifier conundrum Kilentra Solid State 22 31st January 2003 05:06 AM
Symmetrical 400W amplifier Diogo Solid State 30 28th October 2002 11:00 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2