|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vacation Land
|
Hi Sam
You may want to check out a recent post regarding this amp Q13 in Holton's n-channel amp Apparently, there's some confusion as to which mosfet is the Vbe multiplier. According to JasonL's pictures, there is a MJE340 legend with a preset beside it. Check the tracing underneath to confirm if indeed this is the Vbe transistor. If it is, jump 3 wires and connect it to the main heatsink. That should prevent the amp from thermal runaway. Cheers.
__________________
Michael Chua |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: US
|
My main complaint about the irf devices is that they tend to be unstable in CFP configuration. In spite of the fact that their input capacitance isn't really that much bigger than the Hitachis.
Once you get them in a EF-like set-up, they are fine stability wise. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
I had difficulties posting to the forum for about a fortnight. I hope it works this time around. Please see the attachments:
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
A (rather poor quality) picture of the assembled PCB of the N-channel amp showing thermal tracking etc.,
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think the susceptibility to thermal runaway increases significantly with the bias current, especially since one or two Mosfets start hogging current more as you increase it. The IRF Vbe multiplier would be great, if the thermal coupling was perfect. With imperfect coupling I found the bias would just increase all the time.
I would try the BJT at a lower bias and watch the current through the hottest output device very carefully. If you play loud music for awhile then check the current again after stopping it, the current should be the same or slightly less (not much less). |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
[QUOTE]Q12 is not changed to an IRF610[QUOTE]
The above post should read, "Q12 is NOW changed to an IRF610, and earlier in Anthony's schematic it was a BD681".
__________________
Sam |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Output stage device types. Yes or no question. | Mooly | Solid State | 57 | 5th November 2008 01:43 AM |
| Phosphor Question For You Chemist Types | valveitude | Everything Else | 2 | 11th January 2007 06:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08182 seconds (73.00% PHP - 27.00% MySQL) with 11 queries |