
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
22nd September 2003, 05:35 PM  #11 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca

Folks, let's not complicate the issue. Noise figure is mostly useless. I know, I know, you have been told that it is important, but for audio, with today's circuits, it is mostly useless. However, an IC op amp works just like an individual transistor, or fet, except you have to add the effect of the op amp topology, to get the answer to the noise produced.
If you look at an IC op amp data sheet, you will all be able to find the VOLTAGE NOISE of the op amp. If the op amp is FET input, that is all you need to know. If the op amp has a bipolar input, then you HAVE to pay attention to the CURRENT NOISE, because the current noise will always be pretty high. This is BECAUSE the voltage noise is low, and that implies the base current is relatively high. Of course, extremely hi beta input devices will lower the base current, BUT there is always the tradeoff with base resistivity, that would increase the VOLTAGE NOISE, if taken too far. This is what designers live for. The tradeoffs in design for best performance. So you have to look at the data sheet for the current noise contribution and realize that any source over 1Kohm and even 100 ohms in many cases is going to see the current source noise contribution as important as the voltage noise. More later. 
23rd September 2003, 05:48 AM  #12 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca

I looked at the AD797 and found the current noise. It is 2pA. The voltage noise is about 1nV. Now, 2pA multiplied by 500 ohms is 1nV, so the best noise figure would be about 500 ohms and it would get significantly noisier if used with a higher source impedance. A 2SK389 can do better than this, but it needs a higher operating current to work well.

23rd September 2003, 06:33 AM  #13 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haarlem, the Netherlands

SY,
The problem with base current compensation is that often a single transistor is used to generate the compensating current for both inputs. Often, this transistor has a smaller size and smaller collector current than the input devices. An amplifying current mirror with two outputs is then used to get the right compensating currents. For example, suppose the input transistors are each biased at 1mA of collector current. You can then compensate for the base currents using a ten times smaller transistor biased at 100uA and a current mirror with two outputs with ten times gain. However, in this case, the base current shot noise from the transistor biased at 100uA and the noise from the input transistor of the current mirror will be amplified and injected (fully correlated) in both inputs. Measure with equal impedances driving the + and  inputs and you don't see this commonmode noise current. Use unequal impedances, as in most reallife applications, and this current noise term will be much greater than the base current shot noise of the input transistors. An LT1028 is a good example. The noise current is specified as 1pA/sqrt(Hz) with equal impedances, but you should count on 3.25pA/sqrt(Hz) with unequal impedances... 
23rd September 2003, 12:33 PM  #14 
diyAudio Moderator

Ah, thanks Marcel, that clarifies things for me.
__________________
You might be screaming "No, no, no" and all they hear is "Who wants cake?" Let me tell you something: They all do. They all want cake. Wilford Brimley 
23rd September 2003, 01:12 PM  #15 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague

In most of practical audio circuits, with OA network resistors of 2k  10k and source impedance (or input series resistor) >= 1k FET input OpAmps like OPA627 give better overall noise than bipolar ones like AD797.

23rd September 2003, 04:24 PM  #16 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca

Thanks Marcel, the 797 most likely has bias compensation, because the voltage and current noise does not track the bias current specified.

23rd September 2003, 05:24 PM  #17 
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles

Bias compensation
Bias compensation for op amps is very common the get the both speed and DC precision required for op amp applications.
For an input transistor have 1 mA to have the typical input bias current of 0.25 micro amps (with the AD797), the Hfe would have to be 4.e9 for an uncompensated. This is a good indication of how well the bias current compensation is implemented on this part, This is a reduction of the uncompensated bias current of about 7 orders of magnitude and also has to track extremely well with temperature and common mode voltage changes. Some pretty good engineering! http://www.analog.com/library/analog...versary/6.html 
23rd September 2003, 08:08 PM  #18 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haarlem, the Netherlands

Fred,
Don't you mean that hFE would have to be 4000 (rather than 4E9) to get a 0.25uA typical input bias current with 1mA of collector current without base current compensation? I'm sure the AD797 is welldesigned, but getting the base current matching between two transistors on an integrated circuit much better than 1% or so is nearly impossible, even with large devices and very careful design. 
23rd September 2003, 08:46 PM  #19 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca

Looks like Fred slipped a digit ;) No big thing. I analyzed, without actually proof from AD, that the quiescent current could be about .5mA per device. That would help the noise current a little, but it would assume very, very low Rbb'. I thought that the excess current noise could be from the bias compensation circuit. I could be wrong on this, and 1mA might be design center for each input device.

23rd September 2003, 09:04 PM  #20 
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles

Give or take 6 orders of magnitude
On most days I do know the difference between micro and pico. I guess today wasn't one of them. If one is going to make a mistake why not be off by a factor of a million..... Thanks for the heads up. The point is still valid that bias current is still much smaller than one would get without compensation. The link describes bias compensation and even a little bit about the effect of the bias compensation on current noise current .
For some of the lowest input bias current op amps: The OP97 has bias currents of less the 250pA over the full itemperature range with bipolar inputs. One of the lowest bias current jfet op amps the AD549L has an input bias current of 60 fA ! http://www.analog.com/library/analog...versary/6.html micro 10e6 nano 10e9 pico 10e12 femto 10e15 atto 10e18 PS Mr. Curl is either a master of under statement or has exceedingly good manners rivaling those of Mr. Pass 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
general question about feedback, input impedance, and noise  nobody special  Solid State  8  29th August 2005 09:23 PM 
current bias jfet input 2sk170 ,2sj74 at input stage  YUTK  Solid State  11  2nd June 2005 03:34 AM 
How can I calculate input noise voltage and current?  thanh  Solid State  0  8th July 2004 04:34 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 