Roender's FC-100 prototype and builder's thread

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
MJE15035 looks good but MJE15034 seems to be very different from my transistors, direct samples from ON Semi. Maybe you have a fake transistor?!

I did direct samples from Onsemi, however such hfe spread of mje devices seems depends on from country of origin. Chinese devices used to have such wide hfe spread, thus low quality production.
 
Last edited:
hFE is affected by Tj.
As Tj increases hFE increases.
But, I would expect similar increase for both NPN and PNP.
Your results don't show that NPN to PNP correlation.

I did another test. Yes, the hFE increase is indeed similiar. BTW, I find Locky curve tracer is a very convenience and useful DIY tool.
 

Attachments

  • MJE15034 MJE15035 curve.jpg
    MJE15034 MJE15035 curve.jpg
    213 KB · Views: 482
I finally fire up the board and the current readings are fairly close to Roender rating –

Q17 collector – 1.1 mA
Q13/11 collector – 9.2 mA
MJE15035/34 R15 – 80 mA

Shunt read 39V & main is 36V. For basis, it started at 29°C for 185 190 190 mA, and settled at 175 185 185 mA after heat sink heat up and stabilized at 45°C, power TRs are 47°C.

For the Shunt, MJE15034/35 run very hot at 53°C, is there a problem?

For dummy resistive 8R load test; the square wave looks very good without ringing (1 KHz to 100 KHz). Then, I parallel a 1 uF capacitor to the load, I have oscillation, tune up power and fuse brown.

What’s next ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0420.JPG
    IMG_0420.JPG
    188 KB · Views: 442
  • IMG_0427.JPG
    IMG_0427.JPG
    165.3 KB · Views: 448
I finally fire up the board and the current readings are fairly close to Roender rating –

Q17 collector – 1.1 mA
Q13/11 collector – 9.2 mA
MJE15035/34 R15 – 80 mA

Shunt read 39V & main is 36V. For basis, it started at 29°C for 185 190 190 mA, and settled at 175 185 185 mA after heat sink heat up and stabilized at 45°C, power TRs are 47°C.

For the Shunt, MJE15034/35 run very hot at 53°C, is there a problem?

For dummy resistive 8R load test; the square wave looks very good without ringing (1 KHz to 100 KHz). Then, I parallel a 1 uF capacitor to the load, I have oscillation, tune up power and fuse brown.

What’s next ?

You should insert in series with the output an 1...2uH air coil paralleled with some low ohm 2W resistor for supreme stability in any capacitive load.
For any real load this isn't necessarily unless you are using some very capacitive speakers.
 
Lee, the power dissipation of the shunt's MJE - transistors results from the output voltage of the shunt's transformer.
I myself am using a transformer with 34VAC secondaries, and my MJEs are not getting as hot as yours.

You have asked: what is next?
What about listening to the beautiful music that the FC-100 is producing?

Best regards - Rudi_Ratlos
 
Hello, I did some testing for 8R resistor load at 20KHz. One channel is fine, another is overshoot, slower slew rate and non-linear. anyway to fine tune ? thanks for help. I haven't put in the output coil.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0416.JPG
    IMG_0416.JPG
    167.3 KB · Views: 387
  • IMG_0415.JPG
    IMG_0415.JPG
    163 KB · Views: 377
  • IMG_0422.JPG
    IMG_0422.JPG
    166.2 KB · Views: 127
  • IMG_0423.JPG
    IMG_0423.JPG
    160.9 KB · Views: 122
There is certainly a visual difference on the scope.
Is the "system" safe enough to connect a good speaker?:D:D
What does it sound like? Is that difference audible? Subtle or obvious?

Yesterday evening, I plug in my favorite Dynaudio contour 1.4 bookshelf speaker. The amp has good control over bass, smooth vocal and from time to time give me surprise. However, it is not forgiving on poor source.

As for the high, one channel is more airy, surprisingly it is belong the one with square wave overshoot :D
 
Thanks for that report Peter.
I had no idea whether your different channel would be audible.
You have confirmed it is audible.

That was quite a small overshoot, many are worse than this.

I explain that as over amplification of transients. This leads to an emphasis of HF that is not there in the real signal.
This may also relate to you hearing something added to poor sources.
 
Finished building both channels of FC-100. The led's from the front end of both channels are lit and DC out 3mv and 5mV.
Regarding bias i have some problems: on one channel i use 5 diodes and i can adjust voltage accordingly but on the other channel where two TT diodes are having a higher voltage i need to bypass them in irder to adjust bias confortably.
Is ok to work with 4 diodes (two shorted) or should i follow Rudi's solution with shottky diode ?

Unfortunately my test heatsinks are small and they become hot pretty fast.

I'm soooo curious to hear the music :)
 
Both channels sings nice :)

atupi, did you match the driver transistors?

I didn't matched. But I recently purchased some transistors and managed to get two good matched pairs for MJE15028/15030. I am wondering how much beneficial to replace them?

also, if I increase the value of C8,9 15pf, will it help to trim down the overshoot?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • MJE15028 30 Hfe.jpg
    MJE15028 30 Hfe.jpg
    204 KB · Views: 343
  • MJE15028 30 Vbe.jpg
    MJE15028 30 Vbe.jpg
    179 KB · Views: 330
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.