|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
|
Hi.
I have a Scematic for the Cambridge Audio P55. It is a scan of a very poor quality photocopy. I now have it drawn in Eagle . However drawing the scematic was not too hard i wish i could say the same for the board layout. If anyone would like a copy drop me a line and i will post on forum or mail it too you. Also would anyone be kind enough to do a layout. Or even a few tips on using eagle layout editor. As im a newbie to eagle would anyone like to take a look at my attemp to see if there are any errors. Best Wishes Ian |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Something is very wrong with the Q18 Q19 -ve side of the output stage. Those transistors should be in parallel and the diodes are also wrong
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
That looks suspiciously like the Cyrus 2 power amp.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
|
Thanks david ill sort that now . Well i hope so as the original scematic is barley readable. and my mistake is so blatent now you have pointed it out
Hi jaycee thanks i will have a look at the cyrus 2 As i may be able to get a clearer schem for that . I was also told it was similer to a AR model but that one uses complimentary output stage. Regards Ian |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
|
schematic Is now fixed hopefully.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Looking better, but 1N4002s on the output? - a bit under rated
0R22 in series with the output gives a low damping factor with 4R woofers I guess this was a Stan Curtis design, which would explain the Cyrus similarity |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
|
Hi. Thankyou David.
Im guessing from what you say it would be a good idea to uprate the 1n4002's with somthing a little larger for reliability issues maybe. also i have just read the circuit description for the p55 it says " Wire wound resistor R49 ensures a negative feedback signal under output short situations . Thus it is an aid to stability with reactive speaker loads." Do you think replacing R49 with an inductor and series resistor would improve the damping factor and at the same time aid stability too. Would increased damping factor improve sound quality. My guess is it would maybe improve the bass on higly reactive and also lower impedance speakers. Ps Im still learning. And yes you are correct it is a stan curtis design. Kind Regards Ian |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
I would leave it alone, stability problems could be very expensive.
This is a design that will work best with "valve friendly" speakers, avoid those with very low imedances as the extremes like Maggies and ribbon tweeters |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
What rail voltages does the P55 use?
The circuit does work well, however if you're after building a clone the original Sanyo parts are probably difficult to get. I don't think i'd bother with the quasi-comp output stage either. |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
|
Quote:
Well i dont have any maggies or ribbon tweeters. I do use as my main speakers a pair of DefTech BP8's. However for testing i have a set of old celestion DL4 into wich i have installed some 4700 uF in series with the input connectors for testing purposes as i dont realy like the sound of them. The amplifier as is drives the DefTechs very well they are bipoles and are quite a friendly 4 Ohm load also at 91 db W m they are quite sensitive so i dont need to use much power to get a decent listening level. Also i like Risk and i dont have a lot to lose as the amplifier cost very little im using it as a learning exercise to create a clone and learn eagle at the same time . Thankyou very much for the warning but hey im a big boy lol responsible for my own actions and wont comes shouting at you if it lets out the blue smoke. The first thing im going to do is use a seperate psu for each channel and totaly bypass The pre and tone controls as that will remove over 2 feet of track and unscreened wire each input has to travel before entering the power amp section as i only use A Dac as source i dont even need a volume control as the dac as one built in. Kind Regards Ian |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cambridge audio Dac 3 schematic needed | mgm31 | Digital Source | 21 | 19th January 2013 02:38 AM |
| cambridge audio d500se schematic | gari | Digital Source | 5 | 20th January 2012 05:15 PM |
| Cambridge Audio A1 Schematic | Billicar | Solid State | 10 | 1st March 2011 10:12 PM |
| Cambridge audio P35 schematic wanted | sakis | Solid State | 19 | 24th November 2010 04:00 AM |
| Cambridge Audio 'P55' Help! | TD160 Fan | Solid State | 0 | 2nd November 2010 02:19 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |