|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: n.e england
|
Has anyone had much experience with the "Hawksford cascode" (not actually invented by Hawksford it seems but the name has stuck and we need to call it something..).
My own experiments are, I must confess, so far limited to sims and I will soon get round to some practical breadboarding, BUT results so far seem to suggest that it doesn't work as advertised! Maybe this is due to some limitation in the modelling accuracy of BJT's? Any ideas? I have tried both single ended and push-pull configurations and experimented with variables such as collector current and emitter resistor values but results so far show at best no effect whatsoever and at worst a big reduction in gain accompanied by a large rise in distortion. Has anyone had radically different experiences to this? I must assume that as Professor Hawksford is a well respected academic and has published a white paper on the subject (http://www.essex.ac.uk/csee/research...%20cascode.pdf) that it does actually work and my results are due to simulations not reporting the truth on the matter...
__________________
Repairs and mods to Real Hi-Fi, guitar amps and P.A. in North East England. http://www.arklesselectronics.com |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
I assume it is this circuit (figure 9c from the article) that you are simulating. I will have a go myself.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: n.e england
|
Quote:
I will try to get round to simulating his whole demo circuit (it had occurred to me!) just in case there is something subtle about the circuit as a whole that is "special" but, as I understand it, his claims refer to just the connection of the biasing components for the upper BJT to the emitter of the lower device...
__________________
Repairs and mods to Real Hi-Fi, guitar amps and P.A. in North East England. http://www.arklesselectronics.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: n.e england
|
I stand happily corrected
It only works when it's driving a considerable load resistance in order to develop a reasonable swing of collector current to feed back to the emitter. I had been doing tests into 1M and infinite load resistances to test the gain stage in isolation... Doh! Under the right circumstances I can confirm the up to x10 improvement in distortion claimed! Also the mild gain peaking.....
__________________
Repairs and mods to Real Hi-Fi, guitar amps and P.A. in North East England. http://www.arklesselectronics.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
Could you post your circuit. I'm interested in your findings.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: n.e england
|
It's just the cascode part of Hawksford's diagram, with a variable biasing network to allow for different tests at the same current, and with an op amp integrator servo to remove DC from the output.
__________________
Repairs and mods to Real Hi-Fi, guitar amps and P.A. in North East England. http://www.arklesselectronics.com |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08406 seconds (72.12% PHP - 27.88% MySQL) with 11 queries |