Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th November 2011, 05:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Question 2sc2240 as 2sc458 replacement

I'm planning on replacing 12 2sc458 with 2sc2240

MCM has toshiba parts in stock for .30 us each.
They also list a panasonic P-2sc2240gr, out of stock at 6.58 each

both are to-92 based parts so why the huge price difference?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011, 06:46 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Germany
30 cents a pop is plenty for small-signal transistors like these. Pricing of out-of-stock items can be arbitrary, so I wouldn't read too much into that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011, 10:10 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Yet some will spend over $10 for a boutique cap or resistor. Hmmm ?
I just wanted to find out if there is a good reason to pay more for a panasonic part over the toshiba brand. NTE lists their replacements at over $2.00 ea
Personally, I quite sure the "generic" will sound better than the noisy oem 2sc458 currently in the deck. The deck has 12 of them so co$t is a factor, MCM gave me a qty discount .28 ea. such a deal. $9 bucks to ship $4 in parts, something wrong here...
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011, 11:07 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
homemodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Id say stick to the cheaper toshibas, panasonic never manufactured the 2sc2240, its probably a misprint or mistake by MCM.

But I suggest the first thing you do is some maths from BJT noise theory if the idea is for improving noise figures, not all is as its seems on the datasheets. 2sc458 looks like a very good transistor to me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011, 03:45 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
I'm just a messenger here, having a limited understanding of trans. specs. The issue I'm having with the 458 is similar to other posts regarding an Akai r2r GX235 with excessive noise w or w/o any signal present. white noise with low freq rumble, about the same level as a fm tuner with muting off and between stations. And it's intermittant.

Many have posted that the original 458 fails or degrade and introduce noise into the signal. Several posted the 2240 as a excellent replacement. Considering the cost of the sub, I went ahead and ordered a small quantity, and I'll just do a wholesale replacement. A newer 458 will probably fix the issue but I didn't find any stock, other than nte's replacement. But at apx $1.50 ea, I decided to go with Mcm's stock of the 2240 over Nte's replacement.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011, 04:51 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
homemodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Could be, I havent ever experienced transistors degrade myself but some coleages of mine have assured me in the past that it has happened.
It wouldnt be a much of a financial loss anyway if you can get the toshibas for 30 cents, nothing like trying.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2011, 02:40 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Ian Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, on the east coast
The 2sc2240 seems a wasted part anyway. As it is no longer in production, the prices of NOS can be as high as sellers like.
The 2sc458 and similar 2sc2310 are only 30V and 50V parts so you have a much larger range than high voltage types like the 2240 used in power amplifiers. It's quite likely even BC549C/550C will also deliver quite low noise. The best may be 2SC2547, also Renesas, very low noise and still produced. What's more. MCM only ask 74 cents, so prospects for lower prices again look good.

Just how low noise you actually get depends on the individual applications as much as the silicon..
__________________
regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2011, 08:13 AM   #8
NMOS is offline NMOS  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
NMOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Frankfurt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Finch View Post
The 2sc2240 seems a wasted part anyway. As it is no longer in production, the prices of NOS can be as high as sellers like.
The 2sc458 and similar 2sc2310 are only 30V and 50V parts so you have a much larger range than high voltage types like the 2240 used in power amplifiers. It's quite likely even BC549C/550C will also deliver quite low noise. The best may be 2SC2547, also Renesas, very low noise and still produced. What's more. MCM only ask 74 cents, so prospects for lower prices again look good.

Just how low noise you actually get depends on the individual applications as much as the silicon..
2sc2547 its same like 2sc2240 not recommended for new design
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2011, 01:16 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
I used 2SC1815 (or KSC1815) to replace 2SC458 on the phono
board in a Marantz 2270.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2sc2240, 2sa1837, 2sc4793 needed bobekucor Swap Meet 1 24th February 2012 11:25 AM
spice models for 2sa970/2sc2240? bmcevers Solid State 14 23rd July 2010 06:56 AM
transistors 2sa970/2sc2240 pdul Parts 8 14th June 2009 06:59 PM
2SC2240 versus 2SC1815?? kimschips Solid State 13 1st May 2005 09:42 PM
Spice models of 2sa970 and 2sc2240 hjelm Parts 4 16th February 2004 09:27 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.10936 seconds (73.18% PHP - 26.82% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio