|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
What is difference between two circuits
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
In the first circuit you will have only 50uF decoupling between pins 4 and 8.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
If so, is it better the second circuit, the circuit capacity is also simple.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In the second circuit you can still have supply ripple and noise on the supply lines that can get into the circuit. You can also still have coupling via the supply that can under circumstances lead to oscillations.
So you should always use the circuit 1, and then add circuit 2 if you want. But it is important to get clean supplies referenced to the signal reference, and that normally is ground. jan didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
The second circuit does not deal with common-mode noise on the supply rails, but only differential-mode noise.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
I can see that appears to be case but surely that is not the point if the purpose of the decoupling is to decouple voltage rails to ground, which it is I believe, rather than to each other, which it usually isn't. As DF implies the second circuit has effectively 0uF for common mode. The first circuit doesn't care about common / differential signals, and as I understand it should always be used to guarantee stability. I can't see the point of the second circuit. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Since the PS supply caps, input, and output of the op-amp are referenced to gnd, so must the de-coupling caps or the circuit is not completed. IOW, the supply pins of the op-amp must have AC reference to gnd via the de-coupling along with the rest of the IC or instability may take place.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun...... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
Unfortunately I do not have equipment, which have the equipment to an experiment, the results made up better, I think just a noise to provide a capacitor discharge circuit diarrhea, do not know that understanding correct?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mixer circuits | jonathanmatenga | Multi-Way | 1 | 9th August 2007 07:01 PM |
| Connecting Virtual Ground Circuits with True Ground circuits?? | Minion | Solid State | 1 | 12th February 2007 01:28 AM |
| Difference in performance between these 2 circuits? | fluckscapacitor | Solid State | 16 | 19th June 2006 06:14 PM |
| Research on tubes and circuits simple circuits | Cazcotty | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 16th June 2006 12:50 PM |
| 85 powersupply circuits 58 charge circuits | gev | Power Supplies | 0 | 31st July 2005 11:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09386 seconds (76.39% PHP - 23.61% MySQL) with 11 queries |