|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
|
Hi everyone
I bought a China made solid state power amp which rated 90w RMS output per channel and have been using it for 2 weeks. Today, I use a multi-tester to measure the quiescent current at the emitter resistor (0.22 Ohm) and the voltage reading is 0.5mv which I think the current is too low (0.5mv*0.22Ohm = 2.27ma). Therefore I have tried to increase the voltage across the emitter resistor to 22mv which is approximate 100ma. However after every 15 minutes run in, the voltage keep dropping to 20.5mv. Would anyone please tell me what caused the quiescent current unstable and what action can be taken to fix this issue? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
What is the correct quiescent current for that type of output stage? It depends on the circuit used. 2.2mA sounds a bit low, but for a CFP output 10mA could be correct. A Darlington output might need 100-200mA. The reduction you are now seeing may be due to thermal overcompensation.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
|
Quote:
Thank you for your inputs. I do not know the part number of the output transistors but it has 2 pairs per each channel. To my observation, the transformer and the heat sinks are big enough to run the output at 100ma (22mv across each 0.22 Ohm emitter resistor). |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Part numbers are not the issue. It is circuit architecture which matters.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
2pair output stage with each output device passing 100mA is a lot of heat to dissipate.
90W into 8r0 indicates supply rails @ ~+-48Vdc. Each of those heatsinks will require to dissipate ~20W, if you stay at 22mVre. Let me guess the Rth s-a is ~1C/W @ 70Cdegrees Delta T s-a 20W * 1 * 1.5 (de-rating factor for 20W), gives Delta T ~30C. If ambient is 28degC and Delta T is 30Cdegrees then the devices will be running with a Tc ~ 62degC. That is quite hot for quiescent temperature.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: leeuwarden
|
The 'instability' in bias you see is not abnormal in my experience.
It takes a while to heat up your heatsinks from cold, and the thermal compensation, when mounted on the main heatsink, starts compensating after 15 mins, when the heatsinks have warmed up. This is most probably the reason that some manufacturers (for example AKSA) mount the vbe-multiplier to the back of one of the output-transistors, to make it react faster. Best regards, Klaas |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
|
Hi everyone
Thank you for all your inputs. The un stable issue has improved after I connected the input to the ground of the chassis. I set the bias current @ 100ma per each transistor and I had listened to the amp for several hours last night. The amp has remarkable sonic improvement. The heat sinks are capable to dissipate the heat from the transistors even after few hours operation. The transformer is a liitle too hot but within acceptable margin. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: nea makri athens greece
|
..... The picture of the amplifier you have posted is the same with alesis RA 500...
to my understanding a bad designed machine ----heat sinks are not capable of handling the power if the request is 100% ----seems that your model is also degraded by having only 4 outputs per Chanel ( ra 500 is six ) ----design wise the piggy boards often have soldering issues ----quality of make is low ,... ----expect problems in the secondary power supply ---- to protection circuits -----and blown outputs if driven hard that is the picture of RA 500 other than that beefing up the idle on such a machine will eventually end up to stability issues unless machine is used for hifi service and not PA abuse ... Eventhough service manual is very detailed there is no notes for any adjustments ...schematic is available if you think that you can use it kind regards sakis
__________________
SERVICE ΙΑΠΩΝΙΚΩΝ ΜΗΧΑΝΗΜΑΤΩΝ ΗΧΟΥ www.eastelectronics.gr |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
On rare occasions I will predict the future for people. They usually don't believe me, though my success rate is very good.
Increasing the bias will eventually destroy your amplifier. This was not a wise path to follow, as no matter what the quality level, the manufacturer probably knew what was stable and safe. If the transformer is hot, the internal temperature is probably way higher than it should be. The insulation will break down and fail. Though the outputs may be OK in casual testing, there's a good chance that you can now send the unit into thermal runaway or find some other way to exceed the SOA. Any capacitors that are now running with higher ripple current, or living in a warmer environment will fail faster. Of course I am occasionally wrong.
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
|
Quote:
Thank you for sending the information about RA500 amp. The rear panels of both the amps are same design but do not know if they are both using the same circuit design. Would you please post the schematic of the RA500 here for me to check? Thanks Some more information: I am currently using this power amp in my home stereo system to drive a 8" Fostex full range speaker with open baffle design and it sounds better than before after the modification of increasing the bias current. The heat sinks are working very well, at 25*c home temperature they are just a little warm, I have no doubt that they can capable to handle the heat generated from the output transistors. The transformer (1 transformer for two channel) is a little bit hot after few hours operation but as I said it is still within acceptable margin. My Pioneer Class A power amplifier M22 the power transformers (one for each channel total 2) are even hotter than this one. As to the sonic performance between this amp and the M22. This amp can beat the M22 in general except the bass frequency the M22 is thicker. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pioneer M25 power amp bias & offset adjust ? | Bernhard | Solid State | 21 | 6th June 2010 05:47 PM |
| How to measure and adjust bias | ksporry | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 18th February 2010 09:30 PM |
| Krell KSA 80 bias & dc offset check & adjust procedure | Clouseaupte | Solid State | 3 | 9th August 2007 09:39 AM |
| STK series type amp bias adjust, how is it done? | homer09 | Solid State | 2 | 26th January 2004 02:01 AM |
| How do I adjust amp bias? | fotzepolitic | Solid State | 29 | 22nd January 2004 05:09 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13415 seconds (72.15% PHP - 27.85% MySQL) with 11 queries |