|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
|
When looking at the datasheet of the MJL1302/MJL3281 complementary transistors, I noticed it says "Gain linearity from 100 mA to 7 A".
Does this mean that quiescent current should be set to at least 100 mA ? What would happen if I were to use these in an amp that is normally set to 38.9 mA "idling current" as the service manual calls it? |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Germany
|
Quote:
That depends on what it had before. If the old finals were similarly spec'd in terms of fT, beta, current, wattage and SOA, the MJLs should work fine. Last edited by sgrossklass; 1st November 2011 at 08:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Gain typically drops for outputs at small currents, partly because transconductance drops a bit. However, when you bias a complementary EF output stage, for operation within the bias setting, +/-40mA, the output conductance is the sum of the two device conductance (+ Re/2). Only when one device conducts twice the bias current does the other shut off. The idea is to achieve a linear transfer through the current crossover and the bias is set so that the low transconductance region of each device is 'trumped' by the conduction of the other device thus presenting a more constant output impedance to the load, and so doing produces less distortion.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun...... |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
|
Quote:
As far as I understand from the datasheets, the MJL1302/MJL3281 should work: fT: the same, 30 MHz; beta: pretty similar; current: better watttage: better SOA: better. The only thing I'm not yet sure about is the collector output capacitance (Cob). The MJLs are nearly three times that of the Toshibas (600 pF vs 220 pF). Would that affect performance/sound quality or is it not very important? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
|
Anyone on the collector output capacitance?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I am beginning to see comment that the ONsemi spec for Cob is a max figure rather than a typ that is usually presented in datasheets.
I have no way of confirming that.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
I dont think so Andrew, there is a price to pay for better SOA, larger die = larger transistor parasitic capacitances.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
You don't think I have seen those comments on this Forum?
Or You don't think I have interpreted those comments correctly? Or You don't think those comments were ever posted on this Forum? Or You don't think I have no way of confirming my statement?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
|
Quote:
Image1 is of a Motorola MJL1302 datasheet from 1995, note three colums (min - typ - max). Image2 is of an ONSemi MJL1302 datasheet from 2005, now only min - max colums are given. In both cases Cob is listed in the max column, and no other value is given. So, it is 600 pF max indeed. The 220 pF for the Toshibas is a typical value, however, no min or max are listed. I'm going for the MJL1302/3281 because an amp without its transistors is useless anyway. I'll report if I hear anything out of the ordinary when they're in the amp. Last edited by jitter; 3rd November 2011 at 12:10 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
ONsemi's later datasheet may well explain why I am beginning to see Forum comment that their quoted Cob can be different from what other manufacturers show.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2SC5200 vs MJ15003 and linearity ? | gaetan8888 | Solid State | 34 | 17th March 2011 09:41 AM |
| Linearity | rsumperl | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 3rd December 2010 06:45 PM |
| small transistor linearity | akis | Solid State | 2 | 16th July 2009 06:31 AM |
| Linearity | maxpou | Solid State | 42 | 8th February 2008 10:44 PM |
| improve the linearity | E007 | Solid State | 1 | 3rd May 2004 09:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12014 seconds (71.06% PHP - 28.94% MySQL) with 11 queries |