Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st November 2011, 04:38 PM   #1
jitter is offline jitter  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
jitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Default gain linearity

When looking at the datasheet of the MJL1302/MJL3281 complementary transistors, I noticed it says "Gain linearity from 100 mA to 7 A".

Does this mean that quiescent current should be set to at least 100 mA ?
What would happen if I were to use these in an amp that is normally set to 38.9 mA "idling current" as the service manual calls it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2011, 08:34 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by jitter View Post
Does this mean that quiescent current should be set to at least 100 mA ?
No.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jitter View Post
What would happen if I were to use these in an amp that is normally set to 38.9 mA "idling current" as the service manual calls it?
That depends on what it had before. If the old finals were similarly spec'd in terms of fT, beta, current, wattage and SOA, the MJLs should work fine.

Last edited by sgrossklass; 1st November 2011 at 08:40 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 01:19 AM   #3
CBS240 is offline CBS240  United States
diyAudio Member
 
CBS240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
Gain typically drops for outputs at small currents, partly because transconductance drops a bit. However, when you bias a complementary EF output stage, for operation within the bias setting, +/-40mA, the output conductance is the sum of the two device conductance (+ Re/2). Only when one device conducts twice the bias current does the other shut off. The idea is to achieve a linear transfer through the current crossover and the bias is set so that the low transconductance region of each device is 'trumped' by the conduction of the other device thus presenting a more constant output impedance to the load, and so doing produces less distortion.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 07:50 AM   #4
jitter is offline jitter  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
jitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgrossklass View Post
No.

That depends on what it had before. If the old finals were similarly spec'd in terms of fT, beta, current, wattage and SOA, the MJLs should work fine.
I intend to use these in a Marantz PM40SE that used to have the Toshiba 2SA1265N/2SC3182N (O-version) complementary pair. I took them out to repair another amp that uses the same. The amp was working fine, so I know it's just a matter of putting new ones in and adjusting the quiescent current.
As far as I understand from the datasheets, the MJL1302/MJL3281 should work:
fT: the same, 30 MHz;
beta: pretty similar;
current: better
watttage: better
SOA: better.

The only thing I'm not yet sure about is the collector output capacitance (Cob). The MJLs are nearly three times that of the Toshibas (600 pF vs 220 pF). Would that affect performance/sound quality or is it not very important?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 08:55 AM   #5
jitter is offline jitter  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
jitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Anyone on the collector output capacitance?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 10:40 AM   #6
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I am beginning to see comment that the ONsemi spec for Cob is a max figure rather than a typ that is usually presented in datasheets.

I have no way of confirming that.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 10:45 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
homemodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
I dont think so Andrew, there is a price to pay for better SOA, larger die = larger transistor parasitic capacitances.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 11:21 AM   #8
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
You don't think I have seen those comments on this Forum?
Or
You don't think I have interpreted those comments correctly?
Or
You don't think those comments were ever posted on this Forum?
Or
You don't think I have no way of confirming my statement?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 12:05 PM   #9
jitter is offline jitter  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
jitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewT View Post
I am beginning to see comment that the ONsemi spec for Cob is a max figure rather than a typ that is usually presented in datasheets.

I have no way of confirming that.
Actually, you do, it's right there in the datasheets. Your answer gave me the idea to look at some of the MJL1302 again.

Image1 is of a Motorola MJL1302 datasheet from 1995, note three colums (min - typ - max).
Image2 is of an ONSemi MJL1302 datasheet from 2005, now only min - max colums are given.

In both cases Cob is listed in the max column, and no other value is given. So, it is 600 pF max indeed.
The 220 pF for the Toshibas is a typical value, however, no min or max are listed.

I'm going for the MJL1302/3281 because an amp without its transistors is useless anyway. I'll report if I hear anything out of the ordinary when they're in the amp.
Attached Images
File Type: gif Image1.gif (15.9 KB, 71 views)
File Type: gif Image2.gif (13.0 KB, 69 views)

Last edited by jitter; 3rd November 2011 at 12:10 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 12:47 PM   #10
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
ONsemi's later datasheet may well explain why I am beginning to see Forum comment that their quoted Cob can be different from what other manufacturers show.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2SC5200 vs MJ15003 and linearity ? gaetan8888 Solid State 34 17th March 2011 09:41 AM
Linearity rsumperl Tubes / Valves 15 3rd December 2010 06:45 PM
small transistor linearity akis Solid State 2 16th July 2009 06:31 AM
Linearity maxpou Solid State 42 8th February 2008 10:44 PM
improve the linearity E007 Solid State 1 3rd May 2004 09:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 AM.

Page generated in 0.12014 seconds (71.06% PHP - 28.94% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio