Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th October 2011, 06:01 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Lightbulb superconductivity and audio ideas – let’s brainstorm

How could superconductivity be used in audio, and what would the benefits be? It seems to me it would improve EVERYTHING. Have any high-end dealers used it? I guess the major drawback is not only cost, but the use of liquid nitrogen. The stuff boils off so quickly. I bet a number of people on THIS forum, would even know how to implement it.

Suspended turntables, and their platters, tonearms, power amps and speakers that would hardly overload.

Any Ideas?
__________________
People in audio whom I admire.... Henry Kloss, Edgar Villchur, John Dahlquist, Bowers and Wilkins, Theil and Small, Don Keele, our own Nelson Pass. In short VISIONARIES.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2011, 11:51 AM   #2
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Suspended turntables, and their platters, tonearms, power amps and speakers that would hardly overload.
?? Turntables don't depend on electrical resistivity for their suspension. Power amps don't overload because of resistivity.

Drawbacks: cost, safety, doesn't actually achieve anything!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2011, 11:53 AM   #3
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Other drawback- the boiling noise of LN2. And LN2 only allows the use of a very few ceramic superconductors- metal superconductors require liquid helium.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2011, 11:53 AM   #4
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
Also inductance and capacitance would still be present.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2011, 01:54 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
jneutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: away
The place it could be the most advantageous is the voice coil. Zero dissipation would be great. The problem is, all HTS wires are made using a CVD (continuous vapor deposition) or a PIT (powder in tube) process. PIT isn't there yet. CVD is getting better, but it requires a substrate which is either stainless or hastalloy, and the wire is a flat ribbon. The conductors cannot be bent very tightly, I believe the G-2 super from American Superconductor is now capable of a 50 mm bend radius without significant degradation.

A more important issue is that of eddy currents. They are still working on the eddy loss problem at 60 hz, a prime target application. Mid bass, worse.

The more severe application headache is that of transitions from room temperature to 77K. Do it in a short distance, you have huge nitrogen losses. Do it in a long distance, you have large resistive losses. The warm to cold transitions are a constant battle between reducing thermal transfer by conduction, and dissipation by resistance.

Epoxies also become brittle at 77K. The nature of the beast with VC's is such that the wire-to-form bond is excersized in shear, worst case for cryogenic operation.

The magnetic structure would also need to be cold, as proximity to the coil would heat the coil.

Oh, and putting liquid nitrogen in a residential setting is scary. ODH and frostbite..

Making the magnet super could work. The problem here however, is the diminishing returns available as a result of iron saturation. No matter how powerful you make the magnet using super, the gap won't get much over two tesla easily. Many speakers are already there with gap flux intensity, and they just use neodymium.

Research is being done on semiconductors at 77K, but that is very early and extremely cost prohibitive.

Cheers, jn
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2011, 04:22 PM   #6
jcx is offline jcx  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
Data Converters | Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs) | Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs) | Time-to-Digital Converters (TDCs) | Hypres Inc.

while they concentrate on high frequency, if you extend their frequency-resolution plots down to audio "real" 24 bits (at least inside the converter) looks possible
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2011, 04:38 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
jneutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: away
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcx View Post
Data Converters | Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs) | Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs) | Time-to-Digital Converters (TDCs) | Hypres Inc.

while they concentrate on high frequency, if you extend their frequency-resolution plots down to audio "real" 24 bits (at least inside the converter) looks possible
Thanks for the link.

Yah, they like the 30 to 80 Ghz range, don't they?

Not ready for prime time though...cryocoolers are expensive to buy and operate as well. They did have some good pubs on warm to cold transitions..I am somewhat familiar with those...

Oddly, I didn't find any pricing..


Cheers, jn
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2011, 04:55 PM   #8
cbdb is offline cbdb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Unless your recording or processing in the digital domain, 24 bit audio is over kill and you cant hear the difference.
(and there are double blind tests to prove it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2011, 12:13 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by jneutron View Post
The place it could be the most advantageous is the voice coil. Zero dissipation would be great. The problem is, all HTS wires are made using a CVD (continuous vapor deposition) or a PIT (powder in tube) process. PIT isn't there yet. CVD is getting better, but it requires a substrate which is either stainless or hastalloy, and the wire is a flat ribbon. The conductors cannot be bent very tightly, I believe the G-2 super from American Superconductor is now capable of a 50 mm bend radius without significant degradation.

A more important issue is that of eddy currents. They are still working on the eddy loss problem at 60 hz, a prime target application. Mid bass, worse.

The more severe application headache is that of transitions from room temperature to 77K. Do it in a short distance, you have huge nitrogen losses. Do it in a long distance, you have large resistive losses. The warm to cold transitions are a constant battle between reducing thermal transfer by conduction, and dissipation by resistance.

Epoxies also become brittle at 77K. The nature of the beast with VC's is such that the wire-to-form bond is excersized in shear, worst case for cryogenic operation.

The magnetic structure would also need to be cold, as proximity to the coil would heat the coil.

Oh, and putting liquid nitrogen in a residential setting is scary. ODH and frostbite..

Making the magnet super could work. The problem here however, is the diminishing returns available as a result of iron saturation. No matter how powerful you make the magnet using super, the gap won't get much over two tesla easily. Many speakers are already there with gap flux intensity, and they just use neodymium.

Research is being done on semiconductors at 77K, but that is very early and extremely cost prohibitive.

Cheers, jn
Yes, speakers came to my mind the most, as something that could benefit from this. That would be even much more complicated than I thought, thanks to your explanation.
__________________
People in audio whom I admire.... Henry Kloss, Edgar Villchur, John Dahlquist, Bowers and Wilkins, Theil and Small, Don Keele, our own Nelson Pass. In short VISIONARIES.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2011, 01:29 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The City, SanFrancisco
Quote:
Originally Posted by jneutron View Post
Research is being done on semiconductors at 77K, but that is very early and extremely cost prohibitive.
Cheers, jn
In the spirit of cost prohibited semiconductors:

NASA - Amazing Miniaturized 'SIDECAR' Drives Webb Telescope's Signal

Thanks
-Antonio
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Audio Inovative Ideas and More ... sakis Solid State 8 17th September 2011 08:04 PM
I had an idea...maybe a brainstorm result..some neuroniuns re-started to work destroyer X Solid State 35 8th June 2009 09:05 PM
experimental 6L6G / 6BG6G amp design brainstorm chromal Tubes / Valves 34 20th March 2009 11:45 PM
Homegrown Audio interconnect ideas. vincentrubble Everything Else 0 17th December 2004 05:55 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50 AM.

Page generated in 0.14732 seconds (78.38% PHP - 21.62% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio