|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
hello I consider this filter
http://www.hanssummers.com/images/st...es/article.pdf I guess I could I use another opamp with the same values of external components without affecting it's frequency response? I think I am going to try the single opamp versions, since it will be easier to align the components and also it will be easier to add more stages or less, to achieve variable bandwidth. Will something like the cheap ne5534 prove better opamp? Which opamp would you recommend for very low noise?
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Changing to the 5534 would probably be noisier, as the allpass stages are working at 100k impedance. To get lower noise you'd need to scale down this resistor value and multiply up the capacitors accordingly. Or you could use (much more expensive) low noise JFET opamps like OPA827. Definitely ditch the differencing 741 if you want it to sound half-way decent.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
any equivalent DIP version?
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com Last edited by neazoi; 5th October 2011 at 07:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Well I think the TL074 is probably low noise enough for something acting as a filter for radio signals - those signals are already far noisier than the opamps here. The difference when switching to OPA827 would probably only be heard on hi resolution audio formats with better than 16bit noise floors.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Thank you. That make sense
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
For single (or dual, or quad) opamps I would go with the TL071 (or TL072 dual, TL074 quad).
The 5534 is power hungry and you would need to ensure stability. The TL0's would drop right in place with no problems. tbh for it's intended use a 741 (or LM324) isn't going to worsen the overall snr of what comes out all that much.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
SNR - no, but I bet the THD suffers owing to 741's very restricted bandwidth. No reason to use that device these days with the price of 5532s
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Could you give me a review about the AD847 or the ad825 in use in this circuit as well please?
If it is ok, could ththese be used with single supply as well in the circuit? (I see a balanced supply in the datasheet)
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com Last edited by neazoi; 5th October 2011 at 07:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
neazoi... the signal you are dealing with is extremely limited.
Anything better than a TL071/2/4 is overkill... you gain nothing performance wise and may lose out in terms of cost, stability and power consumption. If power consumption is an issue then the low power TL061 and TL062 would be fine. On the random swapping of opamps see this, Swapping Op-Amps... you have checked to see it's stable haven't you ?
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Thanks, that makes sense!
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| active filter 'without' opamps | aaronboumans | Analog Line Level | 5 | 26th January 2009 12:31 PM |
| FS: Power Chip OpAmps and other OpAmps & D to A Converter | dtm1962 | Swap Meet | 4 | 12th January 2006 10:07 PM |
| Mods: Digital Filter, 74xx, clock, DAC, dac/opamp psu, opamps? | DragonMaster | Digital Source | 7 | 12th November 2004 06:07 PM |
| Opamps for active crossover/filter | harvardian | Solid State | 10 | 3rd January 2002 02:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11766 seconds (78.85% PHP - 21.15% MySQL) with 10 queries |