|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Malaysia, Selangor
|
![]() Well...... This is DX Trust amp Special ones. I also attached a picture of grounding method, or others also. Most of the article i saw today, is only mentioned grounding with dual supply, no single rail, which lead me hard to decide what to do. The main cause of the confusion is the negative serve as both negative rail, and grounding, so some matters i learn in dual supply grounding have collision. (2 direction of information) I will give some example : Quote:
Should it be PS>Output transistor >Output Grounding(C8,C16,C17) >Q2 emitter >Star Point(dividing) >(i)input ground+feedback ground, (ii)Decoupler(C18, C19), (iii)Speaker negative Terminal (iv) input stage negative (R5, R6, C12) ? Or should position of Q2 connection and input negative change a bit ? Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Malaysia, Selangor
|
Sorry, missed the attachment. Here goes the picture of grounding.
Add Info : Those quote are from douglas book |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
The same problem arises with most valve circuits. Two common solutions there are bus or star grounding. The main thing is to keep PSU charging pulses well away from the signal ground, and keep output currents well away from input circuitry. The tricky bit with single-rail transistor circuits is sorting out the speaker ground connection, because the current has to return to the PSU -ve but the feedback should be referred to the clean signal input ground. This particular problem is easier with valves because the OPT secondary provides isolation, although there is still scope for people to get it wrong.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Malaysia, Selangor
|
Well.... words are hard to express my idea, so i draw
Hm.... just for clearance, according the typical grounding diagram, which is the feedback ground ? (R5/R6/C12 ?) In my drawing, the right of star point is the audio ground, which contain all the sensitive circuit, and which is the most sensitive ones ? (is it my drawing correct ?) Below the star point is the Decoupler, which may contain sub-heavy ripple. Should i put it further front(nearer to power supply) to improve, such as before the Q2 ? I personally felt that the Q2 need to connected to star(behind), is my intuition correct ? What does C8, C16, C17 does, and what kind of current they pass on ? (will it fluctuate the input if placed near ?) |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Malaysia, Selangor
|
The attached diagram is the revised version, maybe this is better than the previous ?
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Malaysia, Selangor
|
I think of a new idea, if i make use of a very short wire (lesser than 0.5cm), then connect the output device with the PCB through wire, thus make it almost connect to the board, but provide flexibility to change the position of the transistor. (not stiff, but able to flex above the out device with little tolerance)
Another new idea, is to direct the power supply (after reservoir Cap), to the output device at the middle of the pin, then at the end of the pin are to connect supply other component. Well.. its hard to understand sometimes, so i attached a drawing of mine, the gray color is the short flexible wire (stranded wire). Does this a good idea ? This idea easily fulfill the guideline of this : Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
No, you are creating future problems for yourself. Treat device leads as part of the device. Self's advice should guide your PCB design, and overall wiring.
Bear in mind that the connections to any Class B output device carry highly distorted signals. It is only where they join the other half that you have a normal signal. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Malaysia, Selangor
|
hm... what about class AB ? carry only portion of that properties ?
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
AB is not much different in that respect than B, except for very small signals.
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Malaysia, Selangor
|
what about using flexible wire to connect with very short type ? (0.5cm) for flexibility ?
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| single rail, class D amplifiers | zerokelvin99 | Class D | 4 | 3rd January 2011 03:58 PM |
| Wanted: Op-amp with single supply, 32V or more, and rail-rail capability | akis | Power Supplies | 3 | 13th November 2010 01:53 PM |
| Single rail precision full wave rectifier - full gnd->rail DC swing possible? | HankMcSpank | Solid State | 1 | 25th October 2009 01:15 PM |
| Using split rail supply for single rail DC | DanX | Chip Amps | 1 | 15th March 2008 05:18 PM |
| Good single rail opamps | Bricolo | Solid State | 27 | 24th January 2003 04:05 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |