|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
|
I want to triamplify 2 sets of 3 way speakers with minidsp.What type of amplifier should i choose for each driver ? i have 2 active subwoofers (Class d).
Class D or hybrid for bass ? i need 200W rms. tube for mid and tweeters ? Last edited by lduarte1973; 19th August 2011 at 03:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France
|
I am on the same road map than you.
My DCX2496, 2X ways enclosures, Class D system project On my opinion, Class D has a lot of advantages, here. Very high damping factor, good to control the HP. Very good efficiency (>80%), where you need most of the power. Very, very little distortion. And, because you don't need high bandwidth you can adapt filtering (if necessary) to reduce the résidual switching frequency to near 0. Of course, if you like smoother basses, you can make an other choice, to reduce dumping factor. Or use less diameter for your wires. What will be your cutting frequencies ? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
|
0-80 subs
80-250 woofers 250-3500 mids 3500-20000 tweeters the tweeter value can lower since i will replace the tweeters soon , i have fontek ribbons but i´m considering aluminium domes or soft domes like 810921 Peerless i want to keep crossover value outside the 300-3000 zone. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
There is quite a wide philosophical gap between tubes and class D solid state...
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France
|
Quote:
Quote:
And i do not care too much at what happens over 16000. I use a motor+horn, between 1000 and 20 000, and i never use the tweeter i can add for the very high. That's just a personal position, of course. For your amps, why do not first try a pair of cheap good class D amps, one on your basses you will keep for sure, trying the other on each way of the same enclosure to see how it sound in medium and treble ? |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
|
i could cross to the tweeter till 8khz . i have a cambridge audio 740c and a tube preamp i was hoping to use maybe for bass or midrange
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Crossing the tweeter higher reduces the power requirement a lot. Some tests I have made on some modern over compressed and clipped cds have found that at only 2KHz the amplifier has to swing as much as the LF amplifiers.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France
|
That is fore sure. Reason why i prefer horns for medium and trebles, 12db of more efficiency divide the electric power by 16. .I chose my amps for they can deliver the same acoustic level whatever the frequency. On some of my best mixes the sampled 1/3oct peak levels of a tune were near flat from 40 to 10000hz.
Last edited by Esperado; 22nd August 2011 at 03:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
|
thank god 95% of my cd´s are before 1992 , my ideia was something like 200w for bass , the ca740a (150w)+pre for mid + and class a tube amp for tweets. i´ll be using tweters 10-15w rms not that much power needed
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France
|
Quote:
That why the RIAA curve was done for vinyl. Drums 's cymbals can generate some kind of HF energy ;-) Tube amps can handle such peak levels, even with a low RMS power ability. Last edited by Esperado; 22nd August 2011 at 03:18 PM. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is the prefered meathod for controling volume | peteS | Solid State | 28 | 1st March 2009 12:26 PM |
| Prefered wavelength for UV exposure | cosmox | Everything Else | 2 | 20th April 2004 02:06 PM |
| Prefered type of components | JDeV | Tubes / Valves | 32 | 17th March 2003 11:21 AM |
| rectifying....what would be prefered (aleph PS) | hifi | Pass Labs | 12 | 20th October 2001 10:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11566 seconds (80.78% PHP - 19.22% MySQL) with 11 queries |