|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#581 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
![]() I guess it's just me the cat and my curiosity, hopefully not killing me.
Last edited by Lazy Cat; 30th August 2011 at 11:02 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#582 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
![]() Yes, always something to discover and improve ... work in progress to be continued.
|
|
|
|
|
#583 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Lasy cat and nico, in goal to drive speakers with "low" inpedance sink (not 1Ohms at all but more classical between 3 and 4) wouldn't it be an advantage to use double die lateral mosfet as Exicon ECF20N20/ECF20P20 or Magnatec BUZ900/BUZ905DP instesd of built in two parallel simple die. The advantage I see in is no matching between parallel devices and room feet gain. I have built several years ago a 2SK1058/2SJ162 (2 pair per rail) amp with +/-36V rail. It was able to drive in my domestical classical use a wide range of speaker sofar as a couple of bookshelf with a 4 ohms/87db scanspeak midwoofer. But what i am unable to do is to say what such an output stage need for modification in lasy cat simple lateral mosfet (one pair sk158//sj162) or in Nico triple pair output configuration => in few words : how to drive such a double die unit.
Marc
__________________
website : http://audiyofield.wifeo.com/index.php |
|
|
|
#584 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark
|
Idefix..
would opt for the more resilient BD140/139 pair for the drivers and increasing current to app 10-15 mA.. |
|
|
|
#585 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Marc
__________________
website : http://audiyofield.wifeo.com/index.php |
|
|
|
|
#586 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark
|
nope would go for Nico's version with the extra driver in the circuit. It has a 100 times lower distortion and a much better drive of the output..
Q-5;Q-6 to BD 140/139, change resistor R11/12 to app 140 ohm and use R13/trimmer to set the Current through the outputs. |
|
|
|
#587 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Marc
__________________
website : http://audiyofield.wifeo.com/index.php |
|
|
|
|
#588 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Off topic posts have been removed and moved to a thread of their own. Please confine discussion here to that proposed by the thread title.The OT posts have been moved here: Powering A Tough Speaker (Split from Simple Symmetrical Amplifier)
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
#589 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Miib,
I do not think it is a competition between which output stage is the best, but more so to offer different variations so that constructors have a choice. In my humble opinion the character of the amplifier is dominated by the front end. There is such a controversy regarding sound of MOSFET vs BJT, but I could not conclude that I heard any significant difference between the two output stages, only that they sounded excellent. It would be like comparing performance differences between a red Ferrari and a yellow Ferrari. Maybe I am getting too old. Regards Nico |
|
|
|
#590 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark
|
Ohh.. this was not meant as a competition...But the question was which version to select for a Dual-device output (both laterals-dual dies), hence my suggestion to follow your approach with the separate driver..and as the Fetzilla thread has clearly indicated the lateral fets do benefit from more driving current..and wit 2 pairs, i think It'll be vise to change to the more resilient TO126 types..
Think you have good opinions..don't be humble about them.. )
Last edited by MiiB; 31st August 2011 at 08:21 AM. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Symetrical schematics are alike plague in Brazil, do you like them? | destroyer X | Solid State | 151 | 1st July 2010 02:09 PM |
| Symetrical out low Zout | karsten21 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 1st February 2010 10:19 PM |
| going balanced/symetrical - what benefits? | weissi | Solid State | 15 | 20th October 2007 08:06 AM |
| Symetrical field, is this? | Raka | Multi-Way | 6 | 14th September 2003 01:21 PM |
| Non-symetrical SMPS output | cm961 | Parts | 4 | 21st August 2003 10:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |