|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2851 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Bonjour Christophe
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Head...inputstage.JPG This schematic look like current FeedBack but with Jfet |
|
|
|
#2852 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#2853 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: May 2006
|
Indeed, THD figures for that amp are very good, Ive got 7 of these amps, 5 see daily use in bars (14 hours a day), 2 spare. They are however very reliable so spare ones are still boxed and never used. Its practically a SSA with hawksford cascode. Output uses Class H circuitry, bipolar and Mosfet.
Last edited by homemodder; 29th August 2012 at 04:43 PM. |
|
|
|
#2854 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
In fact I would like BJT input as SSA
Last edited by DIGORA; 29th August 2012 at 04:52 PM. |
|
|
|
#2855 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: May 2006
|
Theres not much of a choice nowadays anyway, there are no more toshiba complementary JFETs around, the ones that can be used in such a input stage have to be purchased in 1000 s to maybe get 100 pairs matched to Idss and gm.
|
|
|
|
#2856 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France
|
Quote:
No need for adaptation if this is the pioneer you were talking of. (The shematic i founded with google was absolutely different). [edit]Why did-you like to change input's JFETs by a BJT ? They have their own advantage (noise factor/bandwidth/impedance).. Last edited by Esperado; 29th August 2012 at 07:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2857 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
This schematic ( with 2sk1058 ) could have the same speed as your AMP ?
I have matched 2sk246Y 2SJ103Y |
|
|
|
#2858 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Quote:
Quote:
Same here. And I think the SSA is better than the headphone amp (just use the same BD139/140). The head-amp "trick" to lower distortion has consequence with the sound (tho not easily recognized). It is better using a string of dual silicon diodes like in the SSA. The resulting THD (and offset) will not as low as the head-amp but who needs super long trailing zeros anyway. |
||
|
|
|
#2859 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Hello Jay,
I pasted this site link to illustrate my request about the SLC I would like to make a very fast and linear amplifier with lateral mosfet output 2SK1058. The speaker : http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/image...ance-phase.gif Last edited by DIGORA; 29th August 2012 at 08:48 PM. |
|
|
|
#2860 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Near the Ganges
|
Hi digora.
Go for SSA, which is damn fast, super linear and has large power output.
__________________
SSA Important Post Links:- How SSA Works, Nico's SSA, Nico's Thoughts on SSA Sound, Alex's SSA Mono PCB, LC's Scope Traces, SSA BIGBT PCB, SSA High Power Low Zout PCB, PeeCeeBee, SSA Speed, Why Current Feedback, Why SSA Is Unique, 20 Reasons To Go For SSA |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Symetrical schematics are alike plague in Brazil, do you like them? | destroyer X | Solid State | 151 | 1st July 2010 02:09 PM |
| Symetrical out low Zout | karsten21 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 1st February 2010 10:19 PM |
| going balanced/symetrical - what benefits? | weissi | Solid State | 15 | 20th October 2007 08:06 AM |
| Symetrical field, is this? | Raka | Multi-Way | 6 | 14th September 2003 01:21 PM |
| Non-symetrical SMPS output | cm961 | Parts | 4 | 21st August 2003 10:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |