Simple Symetrical Amplifier - Page 12 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th August 2011, 12:28 PM   #111
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico Ras View Post
After building a spider web mock-up, my first impressions were that it sounded very good, but after a while it fatigued me a little (listen on headphones HD800s, which is the easiest way to get irritable). Subjectively I would say that the odd order harmonics may be responsible as it sounds too crisp/detailed for my liking. Transients are excellent bass is very tight and probably due to the high bandwidth.

Lazy Cat, I made a few modifications to the circuit and I now appreciate your design much more. The mods evened out the harmonic artifact and the subjective sonic results are excellent (no measurements has been made this is subjective only)

I do not want to corrupt this thread with modifications as I have asked you not to and would like to ask if you would start a new thread calling for Simple Symmetrical Amplifier Updates, and I will post my stuff there.

Kind regards

Nico
So first listening test took place, nice.

Nico I would really like to go on with this thread since it started as not fixed project but the project with evolving possibilities to come to the best solution around the basic core of the circuit and ready made PCB at the end. So any differences made are welcome and there is no need to start new thread, cause that would only bring a confusion. Let this thread finish the design started as a common DIY project, with your strong contribution. I hope you'll agree.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 12:30 PM   #112
diyAudio Member
 
Nico Ras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of South Africa
AJ, popular wisdom?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 12:49 PM   #113
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormrider View Post
Per popular wisdom, your grounding is wrong. The main filter cap gnd should not be connected through the star point. They should have their own connection straight across, preferably with solid copper or aluminum bar, and then the center point of that goes to the star. Minor difference in your drawing, but it can be make a big difference to how a PS is wired or laid out on a PCB.
OK thanks AJ, corrected.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PWS.JPG (678.1 KB, 1951 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 01:29 PM   #114
diyAudio Member
 
Nico Ras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of South Africa
Thanks Lazy Cat, attached please find my contribution in this regard. As I said the results at this point remains subjective and I will post the simulated results as reference.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Lazy Cat Refined.pdf (42.1 KB, 798 views)
File Type: pdf Lazy Cat Refined time.pdf (34.7 KB, 376 views)
File Type: pdf Lazy Cat Refined Ferq.pdf (9.9 KB, 286 views)
File Type: pdf Lazy Cat Refined THD 1kHz 1 watt.pdf (16.8 KB, 345 views)
File Type: pdf Lazy Cat Refined THD 1kHz 40 watt.pdf (16.7 KB, 431 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 02:19 PM   #115
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Hehehe, I am happy to hear that your listening impressions and simulated results are good. I experienced the same excellent musical enjoyments as you did, only with my BIGBT outputs present.

As I already stated before, clasical current feedback amplifier topology obviously needs buffer at the output and performs an order of magnitude worse if this one is missing.

Your SCH is fixed or it is discussable about some minor changes? Let's say about biasing regulation possibility, for someone to determine the level of quiescent current by himself.

Last edited by Lazy Cat; 9th August 2011 at 02:23 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 02:25 PM   #116
diyAudio Member
 
Nico Ras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of South Africa
Of course it is open for discussion, it is after all your circuit
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 02:31 PM   #117
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
OK so we are on line both.

Look, few comments:
- I would certainly omit cap at input
- bias regulation from A/B to A class
- feedback loop from the output, to better control load conditions
- maybe mosfet as I/V conversion and BJT as buffer

For now enough, please comment.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 02:40 PM   #118
diyAudio Member
 
Nico Ras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of South Africa
I have looked at no input capacitor, problem is if input has dc off-set then the offset is transferred to output. Maybe all ancillary equipment is either capacitive coupled or has near zero off-set.

Yes I agree one could bias it class A, but AndrewT mention that it is very heat intensive and maybe needs a few parallel devices for output.

FB loop from output - of course this was a mistake when I drew it neatly, I will fix it. Simulation is correctly terminated.

Last point I do not understand what you mean.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 02:45 PM   #119
diyAudio Member
 
Nico Ras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of South Africa
Default Lazy Cat Refined Rev01

Have a look.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Lazy Cat Refined R01.pdf (41.8 KB, 880 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2011, 03:05 PM   #120
diyAudio Member
 
Lazy Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Yes I know that perfectly, I want that the amp is DC coupled overall, maybe someone would use it for turntable DC motor or DC servo motor control, both direction linear regulation.

So no signal bypass caps.

I really didn't mean to put it in full power A class, but it certainly should have bias regulation, cause people found out that at certain bias level amplifier sounds the best, it somehow tracks Gauss distribution curve where you have quiescent current on X axis and pleasure factor on Y axis.

So bias regulation is mandatory.

FB loop from the output settled.

In my last request I meant to have mosfet transistor located as driver and powerful BJT as output device, vice versa as it is in your sch.

I think that mosfet by its nature belongs to this position as we can choose medium power mosfet driver having low Cgs, high forward transconductance, low drive energy for previous stage. BJT as the output device will perform excellent. Also this combination suits my BIGBT philosophy.

Last edited by Lazy Cat; 9th August 2011 at 03:15 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Symetrical schematics are alike plague in Brazil, do you like them? destroyer X Solid State 151 1st July 2010 02:09 PM
Symetrical out low Zout karsten21 Tubes / Valves 5 1st February 2010 10:19 PM
going balanced/symetrical - what benefits? weissi Solid State 15 20th October 2007 08:06 AM
Symetrical field, is this? Raka Multi-Way 6 14th September 2003 01:21 PM
Non-symetrical SMPS output cm961 Parts 4 21st August 2003 10:27 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2