|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dona paula, Goa
|
I have assembled a Leach amp to drive my Klipsch RB 81 and am in the process of chasifying(engrish) it. But before completing it, I would like to know if anybody has modified the frontend by incorporating a ccs and can I get the schematic of the same.
Can't wait too long to listen to them through Leach amp Thanks and regards, Gajanan Phadte |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
The front end already has a CCS. Each LTP has a CCS tail.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
WM Leach felt the passive CCS (resistor from a regulated supply) sounded better than an active CCS.
MacIntosh uses a resistor pulled to a very high voltage instead of an active CCS in many of their pieces. Just because something may measure better, doesn't mean it always sounds more like music.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
Actually, I did some simulation on zener reference based LTP current generator a la Leach, and a number of the more conventional current sources for LTP use. Below a few KHz, the active current sources are better by about 8dB (in sim 156dB vs 148dB) when I t comes to rail noise rejection. But the Zener based reference rejection performance is flat out to 100's of KHz. The Zener noise issue can easily be fixed with filtering. My view: the Zener current source is more than a match for active current sources, so I would not fiddle with the Leach design in this area.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dona paula, Goa
|
Thanks all for your valuable replies.
I will keep it as Prof. Leach designed. Gajanan Phadte |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
you can add resistive bootstrap to the tail R for a huge increase in common mode impedance with just 2 added R (and changing the 2 tail R value)
basically connect a new R from the output (feedback take-off point) to each diff pair, calculate the ratio of the added R with the tail R to equal the feedback ratio then the "voltage source" providing the "CCS" thru the tail R (Thevenin equivalent) is a blend of the Zener V and the output - which is set to closely match the input common mode V from the positive input/non inverting amp structure you also have to calculate the parallel R, divided bootstrap V to get the original current setting I am highly skeptical of people offering advice that circuit change X gives Y sound change in basically good amplifier circuits - amps are way behind source, Loudspeaker, Room, volume setting, EQ, listener's mood, ect. in effect on perceived "sound" – you have to ask how they controlled for any of those effects – ask if they ever actually had 2 complete circuits with only the one variable changed to listen to at the same time – human auditory memory is really poor too Last edited by jcx; 22nd July 2011 at 05:00 PM. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Riga, LV
|
I'm also think that the Leach amp does not need improvement, its sounds good (I have two Leach amps) , you speakers are quite sensitive- there is lot of power in Leach amp. Some believe that Leach sounds better with higher bias than in original article - around 150mA or even 200mA-I can not confirm that.
according to B. Cordell book protection circuit can be a problem in certain circumstances ...but this is not a problem for home listening imho. amplifier is very quiet-there is no hiss or hum with professor boards. in my second Leach I place output coil near resistor instead wounding around resistor.
__________________
If time is money then I'm out of time |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
"I am highly skeptical of people offering advice that circuit change X gives Y sound change in basically good amplifier circuits - amps are way behind source, Loudspeaker, Room, volume setting, EQ, listener's mood, ect. in effect on perceived "sound" – you have to ask how they controlled for any of those effects – ask if they ever actually had 2 complete circuits with only the one variable changed to listen to at the same time – human auditory memory is really poor too "
I am Absoloutely 100% in agreement with this JCX. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
Running a service department for a hi-fi store I could do some interesting mods. One time I modded six of the same piece of equipment with a series of mods. I had originally done several mods to one piece all at once and the unit sounded quite different. Doing them one at a time I was able to see what gave the biggest bang for the buck.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
I still think the room and speakers have a bigger effect.
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Leach Low TIM 4.5 bias problem | Craig405 | Solid State | 9 | 27th June 2010 11:04 PM |
| Higher Power Low TIM Leach | Stormrider | Solid State | 30 | 27th December 2009 01:08 AM |
| Qestions about the Leach low-TIM amp | Ryan_Mc | Solid State | 3 | 4th December 2008 01:32 AM |
| Testing Leach Low TIM | ptah | Solid State | 27 | 21st December 2006 04:39 PM |
| Leach Low-Tim Amp Finished | Dave S | Solid State | 5 | 1st March 2005 07:07 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |