|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Is it possible to modify the nfb of a solid state amp to have a low pass filter at 200hz and another amp as a high pass to make 200hz and above. To remove the need for a opamp in the signal path.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
The problem with this idea is stability. The usual filter topologies have a unity gain follower. You can get a chipamp stable in unity gain but you need some external components and its a little tricky to be sure you've got the right values. You'll also need a scope to check you got it right and there's no oscillation. The common mode input range of the chipamp should also be checked too as they're not designed to work with high common mode signals.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
That seems really hard to do, i built the dx precision i for the highs/mids and the dx turbo for the woofer. Is there any simple descrete active crossovers that dont distort or color the sound.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orygun
|
No, they're all minimum phase devices and hence introduce phase shifts. The same goes for your proposed bandpass feedback loop, however, so you might as well just throw some Sallen-Keys or a state variable filter in there with decent op amps and move on to running the source material through an inverse allpass or similar delay compensation---at 200Hz time reversed IIR is probably the best choice for that.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
I've designed op-amp based XOs that don't colour the sound as far as I can hear. Had to use slightly non-standard methods, but you're welcome to the schematics which I've posted up already somewhere else. Or you could go digital in your XO which I'm convinced is the future for DIY because of the endless tweakability and shareability (of customizations).
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: ATC Active Discrete Amp & Crossover Boards | hisense | Swap Meet | 5 | 4th June 2011 10:13 PM |
| active crossover built, now what | lmartine3 | Multi-Way | 15 | 23rd December 2009 05:11 AM |
| Passive or Active Crossover before amp | Zero One | Parts | 1 | 6th May 2009 12:17 PM |
| Active XOs, and Amp built into speaker, or seperate | akunec | Chip Amps | 5 | 11th May 2005 01:34 AM |
| SUB amp with Built-in Active Crossover | Killjoy99 | Solid State | 3 | 10th January 2004 10:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07409 seconds (82.81% PHP - 17.19% MySQL) with 10 queries |