Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th April 2011, 12:58 PM   #1
effebi is offline effebi  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
effebi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Milan
Default 15003/4 hfe

Today i finally decided to measure the static hfe of all my stock of TO3 cans MJ15003/4.
All my power transistor were bought in batches of about 50 over the time, only from mayor vendors (i.e. Farnell , etc.).
ALL are original Motorola/ON (Mex factory) , all never used in production.
I had about 120 BJTs to test, about half NPN and half PNP.
For the test, I had set a base current of about 3,5 mA , measuring the Ic on the 1 Ohm collector resistor. This gives usually 100-600 mA Ic, enough to make the transistors pretty warm with 10V collector supply. Measure was done always after 10 seconds of connection to the test circuit.
The results were quite surprisinng.

1) The old Motorolas had quite ALWAYS an hfe almost double than the modern ONsemi. Typical values of 220 for the -04 and 120 for the -03 for the Motorolas VS 150 for -04 and 60 for the -03 on the new ONsemi.
2)The -04 has CONSISTENTLY more than double the hfe than the -03 in the same batch. (batch is easily found because the transistor has the Year/Week prodution date on the case).
Inside the same batch the "variance" is quite low, around +-10%.

My conclusions:
1) You cant' assume that you can use any ONsemi transistor for repairing an amplifier using the old Motorolas, but you have to carefully select it.

2) When designing a circuit you cannot assume that the -04 is REALLY a complementary of the -03.

I would like to hear some opinion on the argument.
Thanks in advance
effebi
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 01:36 PM   #2
lineup is offline lineup  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
lineup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
thanks for info
is a quite big difference
__________________
lineup
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 02:03 PM   #3
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Interesting about the betas between MOT vs ON semi not sure what the conclusion is per the spec.
BTW I think the betas between PNP and NPN drops much closer as Ic max is approached ~ 8A,
Matching device betas on each rail (current sharing) is more important than PNP vs NPN where the driver beta differences also tend to equal them.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 02:16 PM   #4
effebi is offline effebi  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
effebi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Milan
Current sharing is my main concern.
I have around in operation some amps with 10 pairs where some BJTs run noticeably hotter than the other ones, Emitter resistor notwithstanding.

BTW I have tested also other ab. 30 "used" devices, exactly the same results.
Good news: Only one "bad" new device, a 15004 with hfe = 18.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 02:26 PM   #5
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
I think most amp repairs guys know its best to replace a whole rail at a time, I would feel comfortable plugging in a rail of new devices from same batch date without measured beta if Re was reasonably large > 0.3 ohms. esp since you are reporting 20% or better beta variation
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 02:50 PM   #6
effebi is offline effebi  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
effebi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Milan
Quote:
Originally Posted by infinia View Post
I think most amp repairs guys know its best to replace a whole rail at a time, I would feel comfortable plugging in a rail of new devices from same batch date without measured beta if Re was reasonably large > 0.3 ohms. esp since you are reporting 20% or better beta variation
That's right. I usually would do the same, with 2 exceptions:
1- you are on-site and time constrained.
2- Customers wants to "spare".....
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 03:00 PM   #7
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
well like everything
your time vs part costs vs reliability of repair job
pick any 2
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 03:05 PM   #8
wg_ski is online now wg_ski  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by effebi View Post
1) The old Motorolas had quite ALWAYS an hfe almost double than the modern ONsemi. Typical values of 220 for the -04 and 120 for the -03 for the Motorolas VS 150 for -04 and 60 for the -03 on the new ONsemi.
2)The -04 has CONSISTENTLY more than double the hfe than the -03 in the same batch. (batch is easily found because the transistor has the Year/Week prodution date on the case).
Inside the same batch the "variance" is quite low, around +-10%.
effebi
You may very well get the same variance between two old batches of Moto and two new batches of ON's. Nothing has really changed between Moto and ON - that kind of lot to lot variation is normal in power transistors. You'll probably find that Vbe at a given Ic is closer than the beta spread between the batches - and that's what really determines current sharing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 03:10 PM   #9
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
the devices must be at comparable temperatures to give comparable hFE.

You must test at constant Ic and constant Tc to get comparable hFE values.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2011, 03:23 PM   #10
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewT View Post
the devices must be at comparable temperatures to give comparable hFE.

You must test at constant Ic and constant Tc to get comparable hFE values.

Yes temp is important! If the OP measures same Ic and Vce @ 10 seconds would be acceptable.
BTW beta is a more accurate term here than hfe
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
hfe on multimeters pdul Everything Else 4 22nd February 2010 05:33 PM
Measuring Hfe DreadPirate Equipment & Tools 7 29th January 2010 09:15 AM
DMM for Hfe testing pooge Solid State 4 29th June 2007 02:02 AM
mj 15003/4 on musical fidelity a100-x mosfet1 Solid State 8 15th January 2007 01:05 PM
Mj 15003 405man Swap Meet 5 2nd January 2004 10:34 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:41 PM.

Page generated in 0.11776 seconds (78.35% PHP - 21.65% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio