Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th April 2011, 06:18 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Default RB 981 recifier bridge

Hi All
The rectifier bridges in my RB981s are all bypassed with disc ceramic caps.
Presumably to remove rf noise or diode switching noise?
Is it safe to remove them and would there be any audio difference if I did?
Ta for any inf

Smiffy
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th April 2011, 06:33 PM   #2
Mooly is offline Mooly  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator
 
Mooly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Don't know why you would want to remove them but yes it is safe to do so.

They really do work to supress bursts of rf energy as the diodes come into and out of conduction... whether it makes any audible difference is for you to try.

Once had an old Hitachi radio that had an annoying buzz on the audio and all it needed was a 0.1uf cap across the transformer secondary winding.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------
A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2011, 08:36 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Thanks Mooly
I have 4 RBV981s.I'll try it on one and see if I can hear a difference
Smiffy
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2011, 08:39 AM   #4
lineup is offline lineup  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
lineup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
You wont hear a difference.
Those caps are good, to keep the power supply clean.
Serious power supply designs have got such ceramic caps.
I say, you should not remove them.
__________________
lineup
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2011, 09:28 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
ostripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Albany , NY (smallbany)
Default 100's of actual design observations.

To snubber or not ???

Depends on diode speed and load.
High load/fast diode = YES
Small signal-low load/slow diode = should (to be retentive), but not absolutely required.

On even multi- thousand dollar amps (genesis stealth) , main bridge = no snubbers - extra local HF decoupling at output board. Small signal PS was snubbered.

JVC AX series - just 1- .01uF between secondary at bridge.
Nikko alpha - NO snubbers at all ,2 slow bridges (not fast recovery) - 60-0-60v and 70-0-70V supplies.
Sony 5 channel HT - another with just 1 .01uF between secondary at bridge.

Most other japanese HT's - either none or just that one cap at secondary like mooly suggests.

Comment on chip amp builders ..... they use ultra fast recovery to-220 diodes , have to snubber all 4 plus secondary ???(retentive ??)Just USE "slow" bridge + just 1 cap. Many 20 year old Japanese amps with the same.
Can you hear the difference ? NO , but worst case (Fast diodes - MUR-XXX/to-220 + heavy load) , you just might ... or worse case ,( if the amp was marginally unstable) .... trigger oscillation in some cases.

Lots of $$$ + time , or are "stuck" with fast diodes fully "snubber" it.
(recommendation).
personally , I have my 2 supplies with just that 1 .01uF at secondaries and relative slow diodes/bridge (10's of uS)

Debate about it here : fast vs. slow rectifiers It is just a personal/economic design consideration- (3M = mostly mental masterbation)

PS - where a "fast diode" is really needed is at the amp OP (flyback suppression diodes = MUR 3A ultra fast rec.)
OS
__________________
Mongrel website , always current and updated :
http://www.fidelityforce.com/ostripper

Last edited by ostripper; 25th April 2011 at 09:35 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2011, 12:02 PM   #6
jaycee is offline jaycee  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
If the snubber caps are not used, it is usually due to cost cutting. There is no sonic gain to be had in removing them, and indeed you may even make the sound worse. Leave them in place.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2011, 04:43 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Ta all for the inf.Think i'll leave them there.
Smiffy
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ROTEL 981 or something else..? MUSIC Solid State 1 3rd September 2010 03:56 PM
6 volt recifier tubes no gas Tubes / Valves 17 3rd September 2010 10:28 AM
Weston 981 III Tube Tester - Recently Checked and Calibrated $479 obo baileyler Swap Meet 0 3rd May 2008 01:52 PM
FEN16DT Recifier Diodes Ken Hill Car Audio 2 10th August 2007 04:03 PM
Weston 981 Type 3 schematic and parts list needed Apogee Tubes / Valves 0 14th August 2006 01:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 30.00%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio