Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th March 2011, 01:58 PM   #1
altair is offline altair  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default Modifying the NAD 214

Hi everyone,

I have two NAD 214 amplifiers that I want to modify to augment the current-carrying capacity into a load of 4 ohms and below.

The NAD 214 is rated at 80W /8R 120W /4R.
Its bigger brother, the NAD 216 is rated at 125W /8R 200W /4R
Internally, the only difference between the two is that :
The 214 has a supply of about +/-58V and 4 output transistors per channel
The 216 has a supply of about +/-70V and 8 output transistors per channel.
The same PCB is used for both models, only not fully populated in the 214.

I was thinking of adding the 4 missing transistors per channel, while keeping the supply voltage the same. I would also double the capacitance of the power supply.

Those amplifiers will be used in a vertical bi-amp arrangement, where each amp will have one channel driving the woofer and the other channel driving the mids & tweeter.

So, my reason for coming here is to get your comments about the viability of this conversion.
The following points would need clarifying, as I am not an expert in amp design.

1--- Due to the fact that the amps will be used in a vertical bi-amp arrangement, only one woofer is being supplied by each amp, so the current load on the transformer will be halved. This would allow (theoretically) the output current capacity to be almost doubled. Correct?

2--- The transistors actually being used are the 2SC3519 / 2SA1386. As I am not sure of the resulting matching if I just add another pair to the existing one, I would prefer to replace all transistors with the excellent MJL3281A / MJL1302A. They are rated at the same 15A, but good for 260V instead of 160V, and 200W instead of 130W. Now, if I do this mod only on the channel that will be driving the woofer (while leaving the other channel unchanged), could I have a gain mismatch between the two channels because of the different hFE of the new transistors ?

3--- All transistors in the amp each have an emitter resistor of 0.2 ohms 3W, which I will be changing to new ones of 5% tolerance, but will probably be wirewound. I do know about the dangers of oscillation with fast transistors and inductive resistors, so I would like to ask for your opinions on this. I'm (wishfully) thinking that at .2 ohms, the inductance must be very low...

4--- All transistors have a “fusible” resistor of 4.7 ohms ˝W in series with the base. This is a custom resistor by NAD. What is the use of this resistor? Is this a kind of fail-safe arangement that would prevent catastrophic damage in the event of a single transistor shorting out ? Does it also have an equalizing effect on the matching of all transistors ? Could I replace those with standard resistors, or would it be preferable to buy additional ones from NAD to populate the boards ?

5--- The driver transistors are the 2SC4793 / 2SA1837. Would there be any advantage in substituting them with “better” ones, like MJE15034 / MJE15035 ?

Any other mods you guys would do to this amplifier ?
Are there any things I should NOT do ?

The schematic is here

Thanks for your comments.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2011, 02:59 PM   #2
altair is offline altair  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Here is a picture of the 214, right channel.

One thing that I don't like, on the 216 the heatsinks seem to be one inch higher. I might be a bit short on area with these ones...

Anyone owning a 216 can confirm that your heatsinks come close to the top cover ?

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1050423.JPG (463.4 KB, 186 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2011, 03:09 PM   #3
altair is offline altair  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Well, I think I'll just post this, to bump this thread up, because I would really like to get expert advice on this project.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2011, 03:54 PM   #4
jaycee is offline jaycee  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
Adding more output transistors should be a straightforward drop in, if you use the same type transistors. If you substitute different ones, the circuit may well become unstable due to the different characteristics of the output transistors.

The 2SC4793/2SA1837 are excellent driver transistors, so no need to change them.

Try and find some metal oxide based emitter resistors. Wirewounds should be OK though.

The larger heatsink on the 216 would be because this design has a higher supply voltage, so extra heat to dissipate.

Overall, what you are looking for is an increase in the current delivered. The limiting factor here is the VA of the transformer. Adding more capacitance won't really help much with this, as it will still be limited by the available current from the transformer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2011, 04:43 PM   #5
altair is offline altair  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
A big thank you, jaycee for your comments.

Yes indeed, the 216 has a higher supply voltage, hence more dissipation. To compensate, NAD idles the transistors at 40mA in the 216, instead of 45mA in the 214. And they added heatsink area.

About adding capacitance, it's just because there is space on the board for 6x 6800uF, and presently there are 4x 4700uF.
As the amp will be driving only one speaker enclosure instead of two, the load on the transformer will be reduced and allow me to get more power into low impedances, I assume.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2011, 05:25 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Pardon me for hijacking this thread, but I have a NAD 214 in need of new 125 V 7A glass fuses and can't find any information to answer what type they are when ordering (typical types are slow blow, fast blow, electronic, etc) and I know nada. (bought it used, first attempt to get operational)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NAD 214 schematics EspenE Solid State 53 2nd February 2012 09:43 PM
nad 214 where are the fuses? gregkitchen Solid State 1 18th August 2006 11:35 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2