|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Hello All,
Please see attached figure below. We have here two configurations of a source follower amplifer running in Class A with a CCS load. The configuration on the right passes all current drawn from the power supply through a CCS, meaning the current draw is constant. There is no direct route from the PS through the speaker to ground. It has to go through the CCS first (thanks AndrewT). The configuration on the left is free to pass whatever it can through the load. So, what are the pros and cons of each configuration?? Clearly a constant current draw will make things easier on the power supply and probably cause less supply induced noise. However, will the constant current version be able to supply enough current to supply the speaker adequately and provide good extension at low frequencies or when the impedance drops? Might this reduce bass where one assumes the more current the better? Any thoughts on the relative merits of each configuration would be appreciated. Regards, Greg. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
TYpe A is to prefer.
IT has better PSSR, power supply rejection ratio. Given input 0V is at ground level Type B will put any ripple from V+ onto speaker. Type A will not.
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
|
Agreed. Because input is not also common to V+, Type B is worse.
Search: Loftin White , and look for versions without a cathode bypass to GND. Darius and Sheldon seem to know whats going on with that... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Ok thanks guys. Interesting. What about with a regulated supply?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tashkent
|
I guess the variant B in the post no1 is shown not correctly, I would propose the following schematics for discussion
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Next door
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tashkent
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Hmm, yes a much better way to do it. Really interesting concept for me in my pursuit of low distortion zero feedback circuits.
Thanks for the design ideas. Really appreciate it. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson,michigan
|
I remember that article can you post the rest if it or email it to me please?
I have been doing some designing in circuit maker on class a power amps lately. jer |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Next door
|
Quote:
Andrea Ciuffoli - Documentation page |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What are the pros and the cons of those 3 vas ? | tessier | Solid State | 72 | 6th December 2010 12:34 PM |
| Cons / Pros | Borat | Tubes / Valves | 34 | 1st September 2009 12:52 PM |
| Pros and cons of Neodymium magnets | weinstro | Multi-Way | 2 | 6th August 2007 10:15 PM |
| Pros and cons of corner placement | nunayafb | Multi-Way | 9 | 5th May 2006 09:08 AM |
| Pros and Cons of this technique? | G | Tubes / Valves | 35 | 23rd October 2003 05:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15947 seconds (60.23% PHP - 39.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |