|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto
|
I'd like to replace the RCA jacks and at this time, it looks like a good opportunity to change the grounding scheme.
The harness has already been replaced, as well as PS supply caps, PCB electrolytics, and 1 channel of the input differential pair has been swapped to MPSA06 (not heard the result of changing the diff pair yet). The question is: What is the best routing for ground? Currently, the input (signal) and output (signal) grounds are connected together. Both input grounds on the PCB are connectet to a point between the input and output grounds. Also, pin 5 on the harness is connected to this same point. It seems to me that pin 5 ought to be connected to the PS '0' reference, along with the output grounds. The connection between input and output should then be cut -- assuming that pin 5 is connected to the input signal grounds too.....but that needs checking. Has anyone changed this grounding scheme? Any comments? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto
|
I changed the grounding to delete the direct conection between the output ground (speaker negative) and the input ground (Left and right channel sheilds).
Now, both the speaker negatives goes to power common, as do both input shields independently . The PCB ground - ie pin 5 on the PL14 board - also goes directly to power common. Pin 2 is the signal ground (ie shield). It is connected to Pin 5 via R2, which has different values for each channel. The PCB board itself shows two groups of grounds. One group is connected to the signal ground to input differential pair reference ground, B+ bypass capacitor ground C3 for transistors Q3/Q4, emitter ground for Q3, and C6. In the original grounding scheme, the speaker negative was in this group too. The second group is the pin 5 power common group, which is the ground reference for the protection circuit (between D11 and D12), the collector of Q5 and bias reference (via C10). In the original scheme, this group was connected to the speaker negative too. The two groups are connected at the power common, and via R2. I can see no good reason for the R2 resistors to be different valued. In fact, I can't see why these two groups should be tied together at all. In the original layout, pin2 (signal sheild) and pin5 are connected by R2 and the Pin 5 was connected to the input sheild. Does that not mean R2 is simply unnecessary? Is it safe to delete R2? If I delete R2, will I blow up the amp? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Phase Linear 400 | BigE | Solid State | 20 | 7th January 2011 02:44 PM |
| Phase Linear 400 transistor replacements | dognut | Solid State | 1 | 14th November 2009 01:44 AM |
| Phase Linear 400 Question | mrfeedback | Solid State | 49 | 9th May 2009 03:59 PM |
| Phase Linear 400, SERIOUS AC! | Planerguy | Solid State | 41 | 29th March 2009 02:41 AM |
| Phase Linear 400 Reference Post | Apogee | Solid State | 0 | 22nd April 2007 03:06 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10726 seconds (54.48% PHP - 45.52% MySQL) with 10 queries |