|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MA
|
A friend brought over a DH-500 with a dead channel. He had both, capacitor and semiconductor rebuild kits for the PC-10 driver board.
After installing all the components and finally getting the driver board back in it won't bias correctly. When P1 is turned fully counter clockwise it stays around 450-460ma. I can't get it any lower and it runs hotter than the other channel. I'm pretty sure I installed every component correctly. Does this kind of thing happen when you rebuild the driver boards? Is there a mod to bring the bias control back within the proper range? BTW these amps definitely aren't very easy to work on. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The D500 manual I have shows P2 as the bias pot. P1 is to zero the DC offset.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MA
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Would have to see a circuit in that case... I was going off this,
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MA
|
The circuit is very similar. I'm thinking there's nothing wrong with the circuit and the new parts have just moved the operating point a little.
I'm hoping someone has seen this before and can comment on tweaking the circuit a little. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The vital thing is the voltage across Q9 (C to E) as that voltage determine how heavily the drivers and outputs conduct. So you need to be sure that it is actually working as intended and that the voltage across Q9 varies as you turn the pot. If it doesn't you have a fault and the voltage may by being limited only be the zeners D8 and 9.
The pot should be able to pull the C-E voltage right down to near zero I would have thought. If the circuit is OK then reducing the value of R28 or increasing the value of R29 will allow the bias to be reduced.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MA
|
The pot will only let me bring the CE voltage to about 2.6v. It will go up when turned clockwise but I didn't want to go too far and destroy something. Q9 checks good. P1 measures 0 when turned down. Maybe there still is a fault in the circuit. I'll have to poke around some more.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Q9 and its two resistors and pot operate "in isolation".
Just remove R29 and the C-E voltage should fall to near zero whether there is another fault in the amp or not (giving zero bias in the outputs) as Q9 saturates. A basic diode check test of Q9 is not always sufficient... if there is an element of doubt and you not 100% sure it's OK then you have to swap it. Are you sure the two resistors are the correct values.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MA
|
You were right. Q9 was bad. Didn't check bad though. And the parts were all new. What's the chances of that happening?
Thanks so much for you help. I would have continued to think the circuit needed to be changed. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Your welcome and good to know you have fixed it. Very unusual to get duff new parts but it happens I guess.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help with Hafler DH-500...I'm a newb. | Sonance84 | Solid State | 61 | 31st August 2010 10:40 PM |
| Hafler DH-200 Bias Problem | Pyre | Solid State | 4 | 15th October 2009 08:35 PM |
| Hafler DH-500 Questions | mtflycaster | Solid State | 9 | 6th August 2008 12:29 AM |
| Selling some Hafler DH-220/DH-500 transistors | housing | Swap Meet | 0 | 10th May 2007 03:43 PM |
| Hafler DH 500 problem | confused dh500 | Solid State | 7 | 28th February 2004 08:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09471 seconds (81.83% PHP - 18.17% MySQL) with 11 queries |