|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Hello, I am not very experienced in this subject so I would like to request your help. I have a Marantz SR3001 7.1 ch receiver and only two three-way University loudspeakers. The Marantz has a configuration available in which two channels can be used as main stereo channels and two more as stereo channels for another room or something else. Since I only have two speakers, I would like to explore the ways in which I can make use of these two extra amplifiers that are not being in use. So, for example, one way of using them would be, I think, wiring them to two passive subwoofers with a lowpass crossover each one and I believe I would have doubled the power employed in reproducing low frequency sound.
Another way, and this is where I don't know what the outcome would really be... is that I could wire the two extra amplifiers to these passive subwoofers with their own LP crossovers and the two main amplifiers to only the midrange and tweeter of the University loudspeakers (with their current crossovers, which have a low pass and high pass for the midranges and high pass for the tweeters.. obviously). Would that be some sort of bi amplification? I know it is not the same as using an active crossover before the amplifier and wiring one driver to each amplifier but, my question is: since the crosssovers (first order low pass in the case of the woofer, and first order HP for the midrange and tweeter together) present inductive reactance and capacitive reactance in each case, meaning an increase in the loudspeaker system's impedance as frequency goes up (in the case of the woofer) and as frequency goes down (midrange and tweeter), meaning less current will flow through the speakers, meaning less power will be needed from the amplifier, right? or not at all? If right, the two amplifiers driving the woofers would only need to feed the necessary power for the frequency spectrum the woofers are handling, and the same for the two amplifiers driving the midrange & tweeters together. Please, do correct me, for I am not sure about this. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
What you want to do is use the amp in 7 channel stereo mode. That will yield 3 identical left signals, and 3 identical right signals. The best possible way would then be one to the tweeter, one to the midwoofer, and one to the subwoofer, or a tri-amp stereo setup. You could also use the bass management to choke off the deep bass from the midwoofers for more volume. Keep in mind that it might be difficult to achieve good sound with a passive crossover on subwoofers. I have an electronic crossover I would sell for 50 bucks, but you would have to pay shipping.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| passive crossovers.... | stuman | Subwoofers | 10 | 8th December 2009 02:44 AM |
| why do we bother with passive crossovers? | paulspencer | Multi-Way | 70 | 13th September 2004 07:06 AM |
| dB loss by using passive crossovers? Active vs Passive and 1st vs 4th order | Hybrid fourdoor | Multi-Way | 3 | 11th July 2004 09:16 PM |
| Solder for passive crossovers. | JoeBob | Multi-Way | 8 | 31st December 2001 04:28 PM |
| Question about active crossovers and multiple amplifiers | ogp | Everything Else | 5 | 5th October 2001 05:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08945 seconds (68.51% PHP - 31.49% MySQL) with 10 queries |