|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
|
I have been playing around with this basic idea. In theory (at least in my head) the dif amps connected this way would have good current balance without using current mirrors on their collector loads nor the resistors that are not equal. The thing works in SPICE simulation, but I also constructed it in real life and seem to have a lot of problems. The currents are not equal even if I remove the VA stage transistors..... My question mostly is, if anyone has tried such layout or what thoughts does it provoke in your head. For some reason the idea is attractive to me but as I don't have that much of experience, might be I'm totally overlooking some possible problems.. Ergo |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Doesn't look like the differential amplifiers can work as such,
since they can't share a common current source. What you appear to have is an independent current source for each transistor, so no 'balancing' action can occur. In fact, it looks sort of like a current mirror, but on the wrong side. Self and Sloan in their books give some examples of rather more complex differential amplifiers, some using complementary feedback pairs, but I found them difficult to understand. I don't really understand negative feedback either...I just take it on faith that it works. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central California
|
You've rediscovered the phono stage used in the Hafler DH101 preamp, were the feedback network is the RIAA and the output transistors are darlingtons. The current sources were just resistors to the rails.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK
|
Ergo
Have you seen my message to you in the 'Everything Else' section of the forum regarding my attempts to reply to your email? Geoff |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
|
Hi Ergo,
Please have a look at the GAS Thaedra or Thoebe schematic in the link. They used the same idea for there line amp and Ampzilla and Son of Ampzilla poweramp. It is more than 26 years old! The scheme is also used to some extent by Elantic and Harris(now Intersil) in some of there IC's http://home.earthlink.net/~narf1/thopho.jpg I am a happy owner of a Ampzilla and I can tell you the circuit works best if <B>all four</B> inputtransistors are matched. You need a lot of them to find four equal!
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: illinois
|
Elso:
Thanks for posting that schematic. I'm curious; is there a reason that the current sink/source resistors for the input diff pairs are returned to the emitter of the output device instead of the rails? It appears to be some sort of feedback. Otherwise, it looks very much like the Lin configuration that Borbely likes to use. mlloyd1 |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
|
Hi mloyd1,
I have no idea it seems to be a James Bongiorno speciality. He does it all the time in all his circuits. BTW the HaflerDH200 also uses this scheme but without the detail you described. No wonder as JB worked for Hafler and SAE . SAE also uses the scheme in a lot of there amplfiers. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Moonee Ponds, Vic, Australia
|
<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='4853609'.WKU.&OS=PN/4853609&RS=PN/4853609">US Patent 4,853,609</a> Pioneer Electronic Corporation
Regards James |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Elso i have thaedra preamp and son of ampzilla i just love them
i know you love your ampzilla |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New Mexico
|
posted by mlloyd1
I'm curious; is there a reason that the current sink/source resistors for the input diff pairs are returned to the emitter of the output device instead of the rails? I believe that increases the compliance of the current source. Curcio does the vacuum tube equivalent with his Dyna mods. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Eagle vs. Sprint-Layout for PCB design/layout | hollowman | Parts | 10 | 8th October 2012 06:13 PM |
| Noisily front end | mantistube | Analogue Source | 10 | 16th January 2006 01:57 AM |
| Front end for sub amp | mashaffer | Solid State | 9 | 22nd July 2005 03:35 AM |
| searching software to switch front speakers to rear and rear to front!-dolby surround | MCM | Everything Else | 6 | 6th February 2004 09:29 PM |
| Please help me check the Aleph Front end PCB Layout | acliao | Pass Labs | 5 | 20th June 2002 07:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |