|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Here it is:
Picture 1184.jpg Picture 1052.jpg 6 channels of my Patchwork amps. This is used exclusively to actively drive my main speakers - 3-ways. It has been in daily use since I finished it. Though I am perfectly happy with its performance, I want to improve the power supply. Mainly, this is just whimsy - the existing power supply is more than adequate but I can't leave well enough alone. The Plan: I will change the main power transformer from the current 700VA, 40-0-40 toroid to a ~600VA EI 46-0-46. I may (depending on space within the existing chassis) regulate this supply. This will supply the output stages of the amp modules. I will add two 12VA 48-0 transformers to create a highly filtered and regulated supply for the front end of each amp module. At this time, I'm not sure how I want to filter the front end supply. Cap multiplier or passively, CLC perhaps. Create a new softstart circuit. I already have a softstart in the amp, but I can improve upon the original design. Thoughts, comments, concerns welcome. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If it means messing up that gorgeous chasis - don't do it !
On the other hand, if it means you'll have a redundant 700VA 40-0-40 you can send to me, go for it I like the split supply for front-end and back-end. I've no experience with cap mux but a CLC has little to go wrong, using a common mode choke for the L to keep size and cost down.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
This is the preliminary stage - the planning stage. I'm not actually going to do much yet but I would like some input. The amp as it is today: NPX_01193.JPG needs a dusting! (one of the reasons for upgrading it - to clean it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think it looks superb, I wouldn't mess with it if I were you -just build a new project.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Playing it safe is no fun Gareth.
I have had THIS project on my schedule for quite a while now and it's nearly time to start. I just have to finish up another mega-project first - This One. I have simulations to run, transformers to test. One question for anyone out there that might know: is there any problem completely enclosing an EI transformer? I would like to make a steel box that covers it. I thought I read somewhere that this can be a problem. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
I ran a series of load tests on the proposed new power transformer for the output stages. I initially estimated the transformer to be in the 600VA range and it looks like I'm off by a bit.
The series output voltage with no load is 93VAC. I worked my way down to 13.7ohms of nichrome wire and I have 86VAC at that load. That is 6.28A at less than 10% regulation - not bad and should be suitable for this part of the project. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I liked your original amp a lot.
Shame to muck about with it. I loved the aesthetics. What about two 3channel versions? The extra space would allow the room for the HV transformer and the HV PSU. I am not keen on replacing a 8.75Aac low regulation transformer with a 6.28Aac higher regulation transformer. BTW, How do you check that your 13r7 nichrome wire is still 13r7 when passing 6.28Aac?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Thanks Andrew,
The outer appearance will remain unchanged, just guts will get 'improved'. Quote:
Quote:
TBH, I don't think the transformer that is in place now has seen anywheres near it's potential, as for actual loading. Over-speced, current wise but not having a high enough voltage (and its size) is the reason I want to pull it. |
||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
I would expect the toroid to be <4% at 700VA (8.75Aac). I still don't like it. I think you are going to see 4times as much voltage variation coming from the EI transformer vs the toroid transformer.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Power Supply Upgrade | CraigLand | Power Supplies | 10 | 13th January 2010 02:01 PM |
| Rega P3-24 power supply upgrade | Johnix | Analogue Source | 0 | 3rd September 2008 02:50 PM |
| S-5 Push Pull Power Supply Upgrade! | ambience exists | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 27th July 2008 10:16 PM |
| Forte Model 4 ( Power Supply upgrade) | Jed | Pass Labs | 18 | 22nd February 2007 08:21 AM |
| BrianGT snubber power supply upgrade | PMeade | Chip Amps | 3 | 7th May 2005 01:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11587 seconds (81.41% PHP - 18.59% MySQL) with 11 queries |