Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th January 2011, 11:12 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Default Advantage of jfets in LTP ?

Is there any advantage of using jfets in the LTP than just using bipolar transistors with current mirror with dc offset balance pot and the cussent source/sink ?

Or was it just something they did back in the days before they fully figured out the current mirror and that kinda stuff ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 12:38 AM   #2
Bigun is offline Bigun  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Bigun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: K-W Ontario
Blog Entries: 2
never tried 'em but I see tradeoffs whether jFET or Bipolar. Things I've considered as different between them and relevant for LTP - breakdown voltage, transconductance, input capacitance, ease of matching, availability, input headroom, temp.co
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 01:24 AM   #3
Account disabled at member's request
 
MJL21193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
The number one reasons for using JFETs in the diff pair are high input impedance and low noise.
Depending on how golden your ears are (and/or how deluded you are ), there is probably not an audible difference when using low noise/high gain BJTs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 04:45 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
ostripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Albany , NY (smallbany)
Here I must agree , a good low noise BJT like the mighty MPSA18 will sound the same as even a TO-5 matched "audiophool" Jfet pair. I have done this on my "sacrificial" AX modules. NO sonic improvement with the JFETS , In fact , I could not tell the amps apart even after tweaking the tail current and altering the degeneration to give both sets of devices the best operating conditions.

The Jfets had worse offset than the BJT's , but this was due to the differences in degeneration to set the amp to spec. A MAJOR disadvantage is the COST of the Jfets....

OS
__________________
Mongrel website , always current and updated :
http://67.248.209.21/D%3A/WEBSITE/
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 10:41 AM   #5
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Borbely would only use jFETs to the exclusion of all super spec BJTs.
Curl talks a lot about the advantages of using jFETs.
Cordell also mentions some of the jFET advantages.

Two devices costing £0.30 to £1.20 each jFET vs £0.05 to £0.60 each BJT hardly seems to be an issue in an amplifier exceeding £100.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 11:14 AM   #6
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
In an LTP application of a CCS, much of the criticality is removed because of the low impedance at the junction of the sources/emitters/cathodes. This minimizes the effects of mediocre source impedance or capacitance since the lower leg of the effective voltage divider is low impedance. Since it's easy to do a really high performance CCS there, I'll do that anyway, but really, there's just not that much difference between something simple and something fancy at that spot.

Now as collector/plate loads, that's a different story... bring out your best.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 11:30 AM   #7
effebi is offline effebi  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
effebi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Milan
Well, using FETs makes sense with instrumentation amplifiers (i.e. biopotential amplifiers) where you are dealing with impedances on the hundreds of KOhm and potentials in the mV in the best case.
Here, (Power Amplifiers) with impedances in the order of the hundreds of Ohm and potentials in the order of the Volt, I do not see real avantages. It can be done with good results, of course, but it is far from necessary
and advantages must be traded with disavantages.
Just my 2 Lire.
effebi
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 12:04 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
With JFETs in the LTP you generally can get rid of the Input and Feedback caps. This in itself will make a sonic difference, all other things apart; No Cap is better than "Any" Cap at all.
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 12:43 PM   #9
effebi is offline effebi  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
effebi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Milan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel Jayaraj View Post
With JFETs in the LTP you generally can get rid of the Input and Feedback caps. This in itself will make a sonic difference, all other things apart; No Cap is better than "Any" Cap at all.
Sorry, but, generally speaking, I do not think that it is safe.
I believe you should always set up an high pass filter (i.e. DC blocking) on the input.
What about a VLF signal of 1Vpp that you mistakely get on the imput?
Would your speakers like it 20 dB amplified? Or would your crowbar protection nicely trip ?
Carefully set up input capacitor does not make instrumentally measurable distrorsion that I have ever seen in a real measurement setup.
About "sonic" (i.e. audiophools or psycoacoustic) differences, you are naturally intetitled to believe what you want, you may be in a large and respect group, but I am not one of those silver-cable blessers.
effebi
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011, 12:57 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
ostripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Albany , NY (smallbany)
Quote:
Originally Posted by effebi View Post
but I am not one of those silver-cable blessers.
effebi
"SILVER CABLE BLESSERS"

Ahh , good one! Another acronym for "golden ear brigade" or "audiophools". We can not totally condemn these "groups" , for they do by far the most to stimulate the audiophile economy.

A mediocre design with gold, silver ( JFET's), and other esoteric components will be easily outclassed by the superior one made with good ol' lead, tin and copper.

OS
__________________
Mongrel website , always current and updated :
http://67.248.209.21/D%3A/WEBSITE/
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
possible advantage to global??? mashaffer Tubes / Valves 20 28th December 2010 05:43 PM
Is it an advantage to use this one instead of 2SC5200 or 2SA1943? destroyer X Solid State 8 11th December 2009 04:57 PM
What's the advantage of E-linear Michael Koster Tubes / Valves 34 30th August 2009 01:38 AM
Another advantage of IB mashaffer Subwoofers 2 15th September 2007 04:57 PM
advantage preamp seahag Chip Amps 9 4th October 2005 01:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38 PM.

Page generated in 0.11616 seconds (76.93% PHP - 23.07% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio