|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Paris, Ontario
|
I'm new to this forum, be gentle.
Attached is a design I'm currently working on, in simulation at the moment. I have built a number of amps in the past, each building up on things I've learned along the way. This is the first time I have really tried to simulate first, using Multisim 10.1, but I don't have many of the devices I'd like to use in the database. I'm curious to get some input regarding 'best fit' devices for this design and what ones to use during simulation. The devices listed on the schematic aren't likely the final device choices. Also, the design will also get at least another pair of outputs. This is one I'm looking for any constructive critique for tweaks, layout tips and so forth on. Thanks. Amplifier-CE.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Emitter to Base resistors for output CFP pair are missing.
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
Last edited by Workhorse; 4th January 2011 at 08:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
Hi Kanwar,
what does CFB stand for? Cipher feedback? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
CFP=Compound Feedback Pair
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
Can we agree on Complementary Factor Pro?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Why not Common Fire Place
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
complementary follower pair
or complementary feedback pair?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Paris, Ontario
|
I've seen CFP's arranged a few different ways. I'm not sure where you are suggesting to place these resistors, base and emitter of which transistors? Are you suggesting the emitter of Q5 and Q16 to their respective rails? Q17, Q5, and Q6 are the upper 'pair', and Q18, Q16 and Q14 the lower 'pair'. I chose to make my outputs darlington pairs mainly because I've never tried it and it actually seems more stable in simulation (of course the 'real world' hasn't had a kick at the can yet). A recommended value and placement?
Complimentary Feedback Pair, as per AndrewT, or Sziklai Pair, thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Trnava, Slovakia
|
Missing emitor resistors in output, thermal runaway very likely. R14 and R17 are in wrong place, without function.
Or You have to connect R13(R33) not to output, but to colectors of Q5, Q6 (Q16,Q14). And you can expect local instability with this "triples". Last edited by BV; 4th January 2011 at 12:53 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can I have some comments on this design? | Atomicplayboy | Solid State | 30 | 20th September 2009 07:40 PM |
| Any comments on this design? | icebear | Tubes / Valves | 23 | 19th May 2009 04:07 PM |
| Need comments on a proposed sub design | cdwitmer | Multi-Way | 16 | 23rd August 2004 09:56 AM |
| comments on this design.. | GeirW | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 13th February 2004 08:24 AM |
| Comments on this design? | G | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 16th October 2003 05:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12680 seconds (72.50% PHP - 27.50% MySQL) with 11 queries |